Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp822926pxb; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:33:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPoNxOPFpFUivl7RrygTrSLdpvBkgA/AXY3ZNS1x80Ytnz3fD5hNyquM8Pst2x4GvyFLF7 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d1c6:: with SMTP id g6mr6088168edp.130.1604439184787; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:33:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604439184; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=muRlL96nq+s9o+Om/DsSbSilCG1sHVrIrICFdV4h6eSn8JKpa8lwGnJNltZeNy1rqg LhkCjoiCF9QCsh5Ki26t//iVtEWiiAe/Eir7qVujeThlrDe3IrdE9ADfL9rb0cYCf2+J GRKHyH3pWJTtt01L1NimdNLun9GD/38fXGTiy6N1+cmmqDxnmpACeUYMLuMwFA24YQGC heJmoVW1HaGwKCV0uqc5NvAFbwAyXvDo7hoPDWxUhsjyRlbk6/yzRZ6aravXdwTeVsHb 77hccB/L1ZYu+TxGTjAjfDrOwJ4pOYyZb1Cux4FF26SLtYXasr8qx/jWBSdgwpAqX6Ol kg/w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=ljv1+KvI5hTHcQoof79AZSHu3gwcUWXr8lrxs/yX5Kk=; b=ZaRBg5sNYyGzh6xq6hZRcAGakKaY1iKrvSOUkAHHmbGIto0AGeeYK2o2NjqLcqt8ZK M3OTXrWLtDXwZp8hau1U2Ngo3IloJSFytPgB/UN2kBD9MUgg9AXWOyTDxogFFBcK1/vp VHmoTR2r7UDypfuhIwlNZUss2oMFiQ5eioXBw43ecnd2NCD/MHX8qK5sdBCOMRZ+IZGW CUd+SBlgp91uDtotRCkjlPjzl2VbICo+II3yUeWhT4Z/Ky9ejbtq/n0nMgtaIXtaA9uq g7tY9E/nTFXRqpEAGL8C6fvTvJbqRq9lmfeaMlnJ8D3DteOkyBoWhMT+9PKfqZbJc7TB rKwA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bEVxy2H7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z61si14660354ede.133.2020.11.03.13.32.41; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bEVxy2H7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387669AbgKCV3N (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:29:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56504 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387438AbgKCV3H (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:29:07 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x543.google.com (mail-pg1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B1FBC0613D1; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:29:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x543.google.com with SMTP id o3so14695093pgr.11; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:29:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ljv1+KvI5hTHcQoof79AZSHu3gwcUWXr8lrxs/yX5Kk=; b=bEVxy2H7uj4F63AnHPagvePAt3sVaVtR2OIFbguAGJ7EePVrcUc5Df23c/kp7ynJUC 08rrmUBSbnzZi2s3Z/EvZKEaMNaq/1ZBp80Qn0LwMw9h0RLZvCgy5fS191wad3UdMTSp sj8HE+AuzgIeDvQYB9SAbZLOMW5ImzYT4hUMR3NtyAUl0s+SIubIIRtkMd3U2JHFCroB B6vHfOIq+rfhNoChAXNmO+KUH8OkT6ZBc2fkvvNOSJt+9/G4olmfrmJDAP4CixpLIxZS ILh+9iE0fnPihopFkQHwqlFr7ZBkVwE6ZTtv02RChzRGFvp9opKOl9vmbNXowQq5NQIC 3N8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ljv1+KvI5hTHcQoof79AZSHu3gwcUWXr8lrxs/yX5Kk=; b=B6CeL5GJTeDM3W5xBpoEMQKe1hv3l7E5gN+955Xt6KYIUKVXZotlIJv28l5yVXLqBj sxTaW9Cnnaj3N2yz2nZv8Whf0i7KOrYTHbKwC25tT9jvxd92+FbkqXz4m7ZHuYPzNyhJ c9Rx9Bv5MYdQLJBryVKHHLdgm79niWwtPkBrWq0EGji27bk7HsnZrKqrzVqsrsfTEQFS NIdHL0fyto5sR0R7T59//jhj1rG3zxcCHGDloQxeAOEKcRKAHRqiCs6ajn3B9Szd2cXK aXDf2mGivLcfsx5DYxuFG49SCs6HfYAes2lR26zdGYqgUc4heTqHHxup9MVoYrsHF62O rjJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530j8usol3US6e5R+KUwYQ1aJC7Eym+CaPW9y5c4F3LL1DeOR7Qa rM8eu3yENXXfguWnOO7FiMcCAe/Fb+w= X-Received: by 2002:a62:5f83:0:b029:18a:e039:4908 with SMTP id t125-20020a625f830000b029018ae0394908mr12272492pfb.23.1604438946885; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from google.com ([2620:15c:211:201:7220:84ff:fe09:5e58]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a184sm55618pfa.86.2020.11.03.13.28.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:28:52 -0800 (PST) Sender: Minchan Kim Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2020 13:28:47 -0800 From: Minchan Kim To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Rui Salvaterra , Andrew Morton , ngupta@vflare.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] zram: break the strict dependency from lzo Message-ID: <20201103212847.GA1631979@google.com> References: <20201028115921.848-1-rsalvaterra@gmail.com> <20201028185927.GB128655@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201028185927.GB128655@google.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sergey and Rui, On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:59:27AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Cc-ing Andrew > > message-id: 20201028115921.848-1-rsalvaterra@gmail.com > > On (20/10/28 11:59), Rui Salvaterra wrote: > > There's nothing special about zram and lzo. It works just fine without it, so > > as long as at least one of the other supported compression algorithms is > > selected. > > > > Suggested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky > > Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra Sorry for the late. I am still looking for the time to look into this patch. I totally agree with the motivation of Rui. Before that, just a dumb question. Can't we just provide choice/endchoice in Kconfig to select default comp algorithm from admin? > > Minchan, I'm fine with the change. > > Two things from my side: > > 1) The commit message, probably, can be a bit more informative. Something > like this? > > ZRAM always enables CRYPTO_LZO because lzo-rle is the hardcoded > fallback compression algorithm, which means that on systems where > ZRAM always use, for instance, CRYPTO_ZSTD lzo kernel module > becomes unneeded. This patch removes the hardcoded lzo-lre > dependency, instead ZRAM picks the first supported CRYPTO > compression algorithm, should it be ZSTD or LZ4, etc; and only > forcibly enables CRYPTO_LZO (previous behaviour) if none of the > alternative algorithms were selected. > > > 2) The ZRAM_AUTOSEL_ALGO allows to deselect CRYPTO_LZO only if > CRYPTO_LZ4/CRYPTO_LZ4HC/CRYPTO_842/CRYPTO_ZSTD are compiled in (=y). > If any of the algorithms is selected as a module (=m) then CRYPTO_LZO > is selected as the default algorithm. Apparently depends on !(CONFIG_FOO) > means depends on !(CONFIG_FOO=y). > > It appears that the below change fixes it, but it looks a bit ugly. > > --- > diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/Kconfig b/drivers/block/zram/Kconfig > index 141ce0ebad06..f2fd34de9200 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/zram/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/block/zram/Kconfig > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config ZRAM > > config ZRAM_AUTOSEL_ALGO > def_bool y > - depends on ZRAM && !(CRYPTO_LZ4 || CRYPTO_LZ4HC || CRYPTO_842 || CRYPTO_ZSTD) > + depends on ZRAM && !(CRYPTO_LZ4=m || CRYPTO_LZ4HC=m || CRYPTO_842=m || CRYPTO_ZSTD=m || CRYPTO_LZ4=y || CRYPTO_LZ4HC=y || CRYPTO_842=y || CRYPTO_ZSTD=y) > select CRYPTO_LZO > > config ZRAM_WRITEBACK > --- > > -ss