Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:33:53 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc:     Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU" 
        <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Menon, Nishanth" <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/22] drm/msm: Do rpm get sooner in the submit path
Message-ID: <20201104030353.ny7zvakgb4fsye6r@vireshk-i7>
References: <CAF6AEGstGtBswUUiyHxT2cCm8NwZekDnMzD0J_pQH37GwS=LiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201020090729.qgqish5kqamhvatj@vireshk-i7>
 <CAKMK7uHAgVUPHOPxDdt3LeAWqokxfuzqjZj4qqFkoKxFbRbRrg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201020112413.xbk2vow2kgjky3pb@vireshk-i7>
 <CAF6AEGsCj-AtFozn8d1xiNNFNbuMJ0UxS-eMhBVXiQ7rKahKnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201022080644.2ck4okrxygmkuatn@vireshk-i7>
 <CAF6AEGv6RMCsK4yp-W2d1mVTMcEiiwFGAb+V8rYLhDdMhqP80Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201027113532.nriqqws7gdcu5su6@vireshk-i7>
 <20201103054715.4l5j57pyjz6zd6ed@vireshk-i7>
 <CAF6AEGtgUVXm6Wwod0FC38g91Q8CotLFSoC4NmXx7GzcA=1mOA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGtgUVXm6Wwod0FC38g91Q8CotLFSoC4NmXx7GzcA=1mOA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 03-11-20, 08:50, Rob Clark wrote:
> sorry, it didn't apply cleanly (which I guess is due to some other
> dependencies that need to be picked back to v5.4 product kernel), and
> due to some other things I'm in middle of debugging I didn't have time
> yet to switch to v5.10-rc or look at what else needs to
> cherry-picked..
> 
> If you could, pushing a branch with this patch somewhere would be a
> bit easier to work with (ie. fetch && cherry-pick is easier to deal
> with than picking things from list)

It has been in linux-next for a few days. Here is the HEAD to pick
from. There are few patches there since rc1.

commit 203e29749cc0 ("opp: Allocate the OPP table outside of opp_table_lock")

-- 
viresh