From: "Gerd v. Egidy" <gerd.von.egidy@intra2net.com>
Organization: Intra2net AG
To: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.34-pre1
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 01:41:19 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>,
       Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>,
       Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       mtosatti@redhat.com
References: <20060816223633.GA3421@hera.kernel.org> <20060817124839.GR7813@stusta.de> <20060817204307.GA17391@1wt.eu>
In-Reply-To: <20060817204307.GA17391@1wt.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200608180141.20040.gerd.von.egidy@intra2net.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1064
Lines: 26

Hi Willy,

first thank you for continuing work for 2.4, our company still relies on it 
for a lot of machines.

> By this time, those people obviously know that they will have more
> and more problems getting 2.4 to run reliably on fresh new hardware.

Yes, we've already experienced problems with new hw. We could solve most of 
the stuff with some vendor supplied patches. But now we got performance 
problems with ICH7 SATA performance: a disk does only about 11MB/s on 2.4 
with all 2.4 patches from Jeff applied while we get about 40MB/s on 2.6.16. 
Backporting the libata changes done between 2.6.15 (I think that is about the 
same codebase as the current 2.4 stuff) and 2.6.16 seems like a big task.

So my question is: what is your policy on new or enhanced drivers (not just 
new pciids)?

Kind regards,

Gerd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/