Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:11:09 +0100
From:   Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
        Rashmica Gupta <rashmica.g@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] powerpc/mm: remove linear mapping if
 __add_pages() fails in arch_add_memory()
Message-ID: <20201104121109.GA5126@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20201029162718.29910-1-david@redhat.com>
 <20201029162718.29910-4-david@redhat.com>
 <20201104095007.GB4981@localhost.localdomain>
 <20201104120651.GQ4879@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201104120651.GQ4879@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 02:06:51PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 10:50:07AM +0100, osalvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 05:27:17PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > Let's revert what we did in case seomthing goes wrong and we return an
> > > error.
> > 
> > Dumb question, but should not we do this for other arches as well?
> 
> It seems arm64 and s390 already do that. 
> x86 could have its arch_add_memory() improved though :)

Right, I only stared at x86 and see it did not have it.
I guess we want to have all arches aligned with this.

Thanks

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3