Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1414110pxb; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:18:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwUw4CvQW1nBcRR4QiE1obeI35EzLm83GUIM1fpwtX1LUssvG9yebhjYPJrwk3Q/VbHQ9T3 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c08f:: with SMTP id f15mr24936618ejz.97.1604506704948; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:18:24 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604506704; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oUbf94x36WbVypojOL+Tqr0zaDHBws49caE8LPdI9pcWP/KkL1xXwOvsUJO2GJzv2k vGg6+IwS3VbKU9ImuUptEw/q9jJEhC9oBTowHBOQT1nM6V5AIzEEBB6u4G9YtghxFkpI 9Uc1AHOZyb7CZGIFdroKbZmAmm1sd7retLd24pVNrcY3vq4MEzsttCIKyrcA3Yw0CLzT 8+6UxD1RcC39hMPtQn2vBPwAIqWl0oJ0e5p8vPpH/vzhhsftYnHUKa2HxZZFH9Luy3g6 /bgmj457T/ucTQ+GuCm7E2KVNrNapNjhukMrWfNO5R+Zls+nZYqliwVBAuWgl2zVjKcM NKuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:subject:from:dkim-signature; bh=IlTAb4BQFKLR3Tp2hVVjxVAiIHililKzH5OOJDZzwxc=; b=nj7t2L9DeJg8HWFoz4Hn1yjiQHOdQOwZOXxqRBkXuD3ALzg6TBaLEBtnQusm9uZlj8 5AtYrOAUA1NgNtWJByxr2hyGbvUDqODSKzRFiDZlyQ2ApfuZossa2vQITbi4cDAIFW6d Epz+RXJCu/3c54k5ub7ND/niTv8QXgL6C3vEoNulj4aNjIy//lK5skYwekUtZS5pjOIy AUR030ObDyLl9gtJ7iU8jAccXd1KURRzbZ4Tp7NyE7UVZRVkhSc9cbshpMjYQpcrMXHU Uv7vVsTVfw4A6RiUrVuF3Nd/ISDfAu6/KCuPH2/42KxspH0KYUrRVVLL9VzZcGISePKc g4lA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=QOr8wzrO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i18si1610392edj.583.2020.11.04.08.18.02; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:18:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=QOr8wzrO; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730599AbgKDQQL (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:16:11 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34300 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726944AbgKDQQJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:16:09 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29F2AC0613D3 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 08:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id 12so15871680qkl.8 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:16:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IlTAb4BQFKLR3Tp2hVVjxVAiIHililKzH5OOJDZzwxc=; b=QOr8wzrOvSlBhZ2KeMtFcbmJEhtHgIaT6+6g88ZBDvljUOSxxEwVe5zPghnzfdSkgr 9cjGuWrwaEQcnIbUxY4PFPnLedMUsHGfEv/tmMYRvMTrro4owFbK7oSIoPScj0k0PXpi fheanQ/c6UCG3EHEPDKfhEZ3EbWMQCOPmBHGJFcKjBm3pSBNkNSo7tRD4jbt85uFDyji rFtL2DGQsPwJENXzwRqrLBHokB0oTyftZY7d3uJYuyDnIDlknN0tkwmgRHBY5wGdBsAz WCPWfs+YetVLsE2UDVQRme14fbKVnVLaeQOpiubIVGUhw74nQVdmtmh6IcLhSdSlXyk9 wYiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:cc:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IlTAb4BQFKLR3Tp2hVVjxVAiIHililKzH5OOJDZzwxc=; b=Cj7Sh8p0Cc3cmTdKKMsbztHMya6GSLMTakgqTxOMdWTqhniNdgBCBfrz1CBEO3IGjP bna1T2tld12eSYc8j/iHL/IEQBQ3Q/JBVoOttA5/Huip1Jvza66cOtZIIC7DtW/evfqb /msX22CJDUn6YgCGqEY3RXYNY7mxa53Mh9bqo2/0/cDcUvSdqrDjkFJtSsPLFJC5EqJ+ z1ZHzohCDqDrga1zkq36VzQ5GO96pAR+fBqg8Bbmx54LwngGuX2j5pfkTJ5WZ5xM/CPO y4bnQwHTHBW0f2lHdIN664FBv7AD5PiB0FvfPAeyMcj1jy+55+YnYFD1tQxmmahcGStI 7Idw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532i3je28ewZdTY1LCKZC7MxK05ZbUdkv4UnRYgSEMqlHDMTi7/n bunR8XltbwN1VqlTEw15bVIx2A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:20c5:: with SMTP id f5mr2332163qka.69.1604506567074; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:16:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.93] (pool-71-163-245-5.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [71.163.245.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u31sm465634qtu.87.2020.11.04.08.16.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:16:06 -0800 (PST) From: Thara Gopinath Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] firmware: arm_scmi: review protocol registration interface To: Cristian Marussi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: sudeep.holla@arm.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, james.quinlan@broadcom.com, Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, etienne.carriere@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, souvik.chakravarty@arm.com References: <20201028202914.43662-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com> <20201028202914.43662-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Message-ID: <5bc2f96e-bb66-c816-d856-56a18456dcf5@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:16:06 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201028202914.43662-2-cristian.marussi@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Cristian, On 10/28/20 4:29 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote: > Extend common protocol registration routines and provide some new generic > protocols' init/deinit helpers that tracks protocols' users and automatically > perform the proper initialization/de-initialization on demand. > > Convert all protocols to use new registration schema while modifying only Base > protocol to use also the new initialization helpers. > > All other standard protocols' initialization is still umodified and bound to > SCMI devices probing. minor nit : umodified->unmodified. > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi > --- > v1 --> v2 > - made all scmi_protocol refs const > - introduced IDR to handle protocols instead of static array > - refactored code around fast path > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/base.c | 10 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/bus.c | 61 +++++++--- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 10 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 31 ++++- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/notify.c | 3 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 10 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/power.c | 10 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/reset.c | 10 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/sensors.c | 10 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/system.c | 8 +- > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 6 +- > 12 files changed, 299 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) > [...] > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > index 3dfd8b6a0ebf..beae8991422d 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c > @@ -11,11 +11,12 @@ > * various power domain DVFS including the core/cluster, certain system > * clocks configuration, thermal sensors and many others. > * > - * Copyright (C) 2018 ARM Ltd. > + * Copyright (C) 2018-2020 ARM Ltd. > */ > > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > @@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include "common.h" > @@ -68,6 +70,21 @@ struct scmi_xfers_info { > spinlock_t xfer_lock; > }; > > +/** > + * struct scmi_protocol_instance - Describe an initialized protocol instance. > + * @proto: A reference to the protocol descriptor. > + * @gid: A reference for per-protocol devres management. > + * @users: A refcount to track effective users of this protocol. > + * > + * Each protocol is initialized independently once for each SCMI platform in > + * which is defined by DT and implemented by the SCMI server fw. > + */ > +struct scmi_protocol_instance { > + const struct scmi_protocol *proto; > + void *gid; > + refcount_t users; > +}; Why do you need a separate protocol_instance? Will there be two instances of the same protocol for a single scmi device/instance? Else everything that has been defined in this struct in this patch the following ones can be rolled into scmi_protocol struct, right ? > + > /** > * struct scmi_info - Structure representing a SCMI instance > * > @@ -80,6 +97,10 @@ struct scmi_xfers_info { > * @rx_minfo: Universal Receive Message management info > * @tx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Tx channel info pointer > * @rx_idr: IDR object to map protocol id to Rx channel info pointer > + * @protocols: IDR for protocols' instance descriptors initialized for > + * this SCMI instance: populated on protocol's first attempted > + * usage. > + * @protocols_mtx: A mutex to protect protocols instances initialization. > * @protocols_imp: List of protocols implemented, currently maximum of > * MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP elements allocated by the base protocol > * @node: List head > @@ -94,6 +115,9 @@ struct scmi_info { > struct scmi_xfers_info rx_minfo; > struct idr tx_idr; > struct idr rx_idr; > + struct idr protocols; > + /* Ensure mutual exclusive access to protocols instance array */ > + struct mutex protocols_mtx; > u8 *protocols_imp; > struct list_head node; > int users; > @@ -519,6 +543,127 @@ int scmi_version_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol, > return ret; > } > > +/** > + * scmi_get_protocol_instance - Protocol initialization helper. > + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance. > + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested. > + * > + * In case the required protocol has never been requested before for this > + * instance, allocate and initialize all the needed structures while handling > + * resource allocation with a dedicated per-protocol devres subgroup. > + * > + * Return: A reference to an initialized protocol instance or error on failure. > + */ > +static struct scmi_protocol_instance * __must_check > +scmi_get_protocol_instance(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id) > +{ > + int ret = -ENOMEM; > + void *gid; > + struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi; > + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); > + > + mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx); > + pi = idr_find(&info->protocols, protocol_id); > + > + if (pi) { > + refcount_inc(&pi->users); > + } else { > + const struct scmi_protocol *proto; > + > + /* Fail if protocol not registered on bus */ > + proto = scmi_get_protocol(protocol_id); > + if (!proto) { > + ret = -ENODEV; > + goto out; > + } > + > + /* Protocol specific devres group */ > + gid = devres_open_group(handle->dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!gid) > + goto out; > + > + pi = devm_kzalloc(handle->dev, sizeof(*pi), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!pi) > + goto clean; > + > + pi->gid = gid; > + pi->proto = proto; > + refcount_set(&pi->users, 1); > + /* proto->init is assured NON NULL by scmi_protocol_register */ > + ret = pi->proto->init(handle); So init for a protocol will be called twice. Is this intentional ? Once during the device probe via scmi_dev_probe and scmi_protocol_init. And once via scmi_get_protocol_instance which gets called in get_ops apis defined and used in the later patches. > + if (ret) > + goto clean; > + > + ret = idr_alloc(&info->protocols, pi, > + protocol_id, protocol_id + 1, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (ret != protocol_id) > + goto clean; > + > + devres_close_group(handle->dev, pi->gid); > + dev_dbg(handle->dev, "Initialized protocol: 0x%X\n", > + protocol_id); > + } > + mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx); > + > + return pi; > + > +clean: > + devres_release_group(handle->dev, gid); > +out: > + mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx); > + return ERR_PTR(ret); > +} > + > +/** > + * scmi_acquire_protocol - Protocol acquire > + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance. > + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested. > + * > + * Register a new user for the requested protocol on the specified SCMI > + * platform instance, possibly triggering its initialization on first user. > + * > + * Return: 0 if protocol was acquired successfully. > + */ > +int scmi_acquire_protocol(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id) > +{ > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(scmi_get_protocol_instance(handle, protocol_id)); > +} > + > +/** > + * scmi_release_protocol - Protocol de-initialization helper. > + * @handle: A reference to the SCMI platform instance. > + * @protocol_id: The protocol being requested. > + * > + * Remove one user for the specified protocol and triggers de-initialization > + * and resources de-allocation once the last user has gone. > + */ > +void scmi_release_protocol(struct scmi_handle *handle, u8 protocol_id) > +{ > + struct scmi_info *info = handle_to_scmi_info(handle); > + struct scmi_protocol_instance *pi; > + > + mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx); > + pi = idr_find(&info->protocols, protocol_id); > + if (WARN_ON(!pi)) > + goto out; > + > + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pi->users)) { > + void *gid = pi->gid; > + > + if (pi->proto->deinit) > + pi->proto->deinit(handle); > + > + idr_remove(&info->protocols, protocol_id); > + > + devres_release_group(handle->dev, gid); > + dev_dbg(handle->dev, "De-Initialized protocol: 0x%X\n", > + protocol_id); > + } > + > +out: > + mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx); > +} > + > void scmi_setup_protocol_implemented(const struct scmi_handle *handle, > u8 *prot_imp) > { > @@ -785,6 +930,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > info->dev = dev; > info->desc = desc; > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&info->node); > + idr_init(&info->protocols); > + mutex_init(&info->protocols_mtx); > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info); > idr_init(&info->tx_idr); > @@ -805,9 +952,14 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (scmi_notification_init(handle)) > dev_err(dev, "SCMI Notifications NOT available.\n"); > > - ret = scmi_base_protocol_init(handle); > + /* > + * Trigger SCMI Base protocol initialization. > + * It's mandatory and won't be ever released/deinit until the > + * SCMI stack is shutdown/unloaded as a whole. > + */ > + ret = scmi_acquire_protocol(handle, SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE); > if (ret) { > - dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI(%d)\n", ret); > + dev_err(dev, "unable to communicate with SCMI\n"); > return ret; > } > > @@ -859,6 +1011,10 @@ static int scmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + mutex_lock(&info->protocols_mtx); > + idr_destroy(&info->protocols); > + mutex_unlock(&info->protocols_mtx); > + > /* Safe to free channels since no more users */ > ret = idr_for_each(idr, info->desc->ops->chan_free, idr); > idr_destroy(&info->tx_idr); > @@ -941,6 +1097,8 @@ static int __init scmi_driver_init(void) > { > scmi_bus_init(); > > + scmi_base_register(); > + minor nit. extra line addeed ? -- Warm Regards Thara