Message-ID: <44E59FF1.6090703@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:09:37 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jesse Huang <jesse@icplus.com.tw>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] IP100A, add end of pci id table
References: <1155841247.4532.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44E480FA.70806@pobox.com> <02d101c6c28a$7c19d160$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw>
In-Reply-To: <02d101c6c28a$7c19d160$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 805
Lines: 25

Jesse Huang wrote:
> Hi Jeff:
> 
>     Sorry for that. I will remove those. Am I need to resent all of those
> patch or send all in one patch?

Normally, when I merged a patch, you will receive a one-word reply 
"applied" or "merged".  Or for a series of patches, "applies patches 1-6".

For this series of patches, you will need to resend the entire patchset, 
modified with the comments so far.

It is quite normal for some patchsets to undergo several iterations 
before being merged, when engineering review highlights issues.

Thanks and regards,

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/