Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp285446pxb; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 23:06:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzX19XU888mL720AsCGKsbm/AY/JOLEIeWisXspaw16jjx/MficNJuQwjugG5ZigZ0a49a/ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:21c7:: with SMTP id bi7mr1222950edb.54.1604559966767; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 23:06:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604559966; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PVAaDqoAth+gGWq29fIDfvOzqKfzRRbeA3g2j1udCfKRNQ/wm/DTRF17DLgz6Z9qTk ksA1+OU6pprGTkAEnlsM8PsXjfW/3YiRJBzCLDqzyTDmUwUIRQgYeF3a9LP6Hq3iPA4H 5T6PMKEXEm4N68sjrYqQXFDlUP8/2v5mWkfWG9B3jAcg5dBso9Utok71X6IPk7vqC7OE y4/dVP0ADc5v1qPRvOihp9VQaR52WMUIo+CicR9CGl/1GE1ijRbCf32CHRxkOlOVaKQN qEJ5GG+Xf83GkaB/vBm055Ig9EjXOAOmkGHa8cRt6jHEmu1zsSLSwRaxzez0mYA4P8Kj 9Lig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=j0cItyzXnN05PEymUiVPpxa/gRPBRWPOMzuhzGbrfhs=; b=qKpGzp/sKSA9DwO5396MUKlbuDj1sEZMN0ntLATTlOCWaDdW7acwvNjI6xAdXNzApV xESDfnJU1PH7Sxc0vYexx1zxBqW9Cctgus4epKX7PSr9Vg9hdfHmY4e+BZgejugft5q9 1N049QyeneN72RP7h5USjlk7Xf+IuXNDTUY1fSKxiaJZQA5Pn6//4c9UkLLRe5oc34u4 EMOEXOmEuLOufJuoLD0iRQBzJnOfryAWvAGmFgcr7jS/eR3cTLVllsMm5s++SWwFRXs+ BWo5esU4RUAEnj/22+VvaTi8uGUalsAy79CBseeBZdRadCD83fEIcqhuZJvVsIGCI2Tk IdMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mGMRHmoa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cc21si709250edb.123.2020.11.04.23.05.43; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 23:06:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mGMRHmoa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727658AbgKEHB6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 02:01:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59244 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725294AbgKEHB6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 02:01:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6DEBC0613CF; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 23:01:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id w1so382718edv.11; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 23:01:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j0cItyzXnN05PEymUiVPpxa/gRPBRWPOMzuhzGbrfhs=; b=mGMRHmoakWbpA8XNBnhpRjgaRsK+Cypk5WrDGfifG4aBbuHcSaKJKDSLIUkT4VlkOO f2KaBrW097DjB9qDZ0qD7Vob1ElCRyHyUBdsrqt9lTEBvMw6FHGKB4jUkFNiTSsVRS21 6PmJ8lbrjlnAQpiwNiU/JW9Gh7g2NuU4pq+TD/uSzW8Si17RuiqdZuqBEIOYpm+nNLhj xuFoWGiMWRL0Xxvui2Q0t0VoMAGJHuiBCkzlj6w76tp05kEhIVH5lvKgjAWMif++Hqhw 0Q7PDgZHqW39Etu6DY8UPniSHdRnE5dMA5tBvvSBHBtFFayaV7tEKqW4VhdHi8i/iokX WJZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j0cItyzXnN05PEymUiVPpxa/gRPBRWPOMzuhzGbrfhs=; b=brn3utoRVgzmYh7Jpfn60Dm8QjFHQwHYN0XWzlASPqGvFLrD6dMxNb5QvIdBXLS4wR l3OnEIfYBgrHS3hDUmAIaQJpGNjuci9kM9zpTxFqWuOrnQYWbzqOHgK7yKCGZIvoF8zW gmqlKMt0ZF5BYzXxyC6FZhbcuju4F4S6awb9GuwbKoj6Mb/1G7iRaNiMxAScfA7JBcYI RGhYlcjYfnZzsQ6I7F3UP9SU3QG7Gozk7Eo5q0h2BiBsr39XKtg0xDHUyTEnXTRuyZLU 0SF2E38IHUYhSc8Nfyt0PTVm6hE+mofkG9GcjjjAWOF51/E0NRkSJzeItHMFw9q4ycxE ZYIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530venIQoxH/YO5yzhQIR8UIkSN1+jbU2YbbT/a+ywWEJ06HKHbY FPw2/QMU7daaTR4vgwTAmrxEu90gu525Bg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:e789:: with SMTP id b9mr1153052edn.272.1604559715778; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 23:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2003:ea:8f23:2800:59d0:7417:1e79:f522? (p200300ea8f23280059d074171e79f522.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:ea:8f23:2800:59d0:7417:1e79:f522]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a17sm330462eda.45.2020.11.04.23.01.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 23:01:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Very slow realtek 8169 ethernet performance, but only one interface, on ThinkPad T14. To: Qu Wenruo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <57f16fe7-2052-72cc-6628-bbb04f146ce0@gmx.com> From: Heiner Kallweit Message-ID: <7ee6a86c-5aca-3931-73cc-2ab72d8dd8a7@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:01:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57f16fe7-2052-72cc-6628-bbb04f146ce0@gmx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05.11.2020 03:48, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure if this is a regression or not, but just find out that after upgrading to v5.9 kernel, one of my ethernet port on my ThinkPad T14 (ryzen version) becomes very slow. > > Only *2~3* Mbps. > > The laptop has two ethernet interfaces, one needs a passive adapter, the other one is a standard RJ45. > > The offending one is the one which needs the adapter (eth0). > While the RJ45 one is completely fine. > > 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 0e) > 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 15) > > The 02:00.0 one is the affected one. > > The related dmesgs are: > [ 38.110293] r8169 0000:02:00.0: can't disable ASPM; OS doesn't have ASPM control > [ 38.126069] libphy: r8169: probed > [ 38.126250] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: RTL8168ep/8111ep, 00:2b:67:b3:d9:20, XID 502, IRQ 105 > [ 38.126252] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9194 bytes, tx checksumming: ko] > [ 38.126294] r8169 0000:05:00.0: can't disable ASPM; OS doesn't have ASPM control > [ 38.126300] r8169 0000:05:00.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0003) > [ 38.139355] libphy: r8169: probed > [ 38.139523] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth1: RTL8168h/8111h, 00:2b:67:b3:d9:1f, XID 541, IRQ 107 > [ 38.139525] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth1: jumbo features [frames: 9194 bytes, tx checksumming: ko] > [ 42.120935] Generic FE-GE Realtek PHY r8169-200:00: attached PHY driver [Generic FE-GE Realtek PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=r8169-200:00, irq=IGNORE) > [ 42.247646] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Down > [ 42.280799] Generic FE-GE Realtek PHY r8169-500:00: attached PHY driver [Generic FE-GE Realtek PHY] (mii_bus:phy_addr=r8169-500:00, irq=IGNORE) > [ 42.477616] r8169 0000:05:00.0 eth1: Link is Down > [ 76.479569] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > [ 91.271894] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Down > [ 99.873390] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > [ 99.878938] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Down > [ 102.579290] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > [ 185.086002] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Down > [ 392.884584] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > [ 392.891208] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Down > [ 395.889047] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx > [ 406.670738] r8169 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Link is Down > > Really nothing strange, even it negotiates to 1Gbps. > > But during iperf3, it only goes up to miserable 3Mbps. > > Is this some known bug or something special related to the passive adapter? > > Since the adapter is passive, and hasn't experience anything wrong for a long time, I really doubt that. > > Thanks, > Qu > > Thanks for the report. From which kernel version did you upgrade? Please test with the prior kernel version and report behavior (link stability and speed). Under 5.9, does ethtool -S eth0 report packet errors?