Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201105174549.614c2de4@canb.auug.org.au> <20201105070311.GU4879@kernel.org>
 <CAATStaMD=w+onf==L-=MQ7suJf6EaNoup5o8yW-TEbfajkbdaQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAATStaMD=w+onf==L-=MQ7suJf6EaNoup5o8yW-TEbfajkbdaQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Anand K. Mistry" <amistry@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 18:45:04 +1100
Message-ID: <CAATStaMEn_CSfvc=JTawGhL8yt3L0cci8XK9ru+F6RGzRcYJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

SNIPPED

> >
> > Looks like left column became too wide, so rather than shift the right
> > column to the right, I'd suggest to drop underscores in Speculation*.
>
> Hm. That makes it inconsistent with Speculation_Store_Bypass. I guess
> it's the lesser of two evils.

Oh, do you mean renaming the existing Speculation_Store_Bypass? I
thought that was a big no-no for the kernel?