Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201011024831.3868571-1-daniel@0x0f.com> <20201011024831.3868571-2-daniel@0x0f.com>
 <CACRpkdZDyp83AiGkX9eFe2_w9eK1NXREFG896DZfPUaHboy+0g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJKOXPecUBTqbyiQQRdSPq_YuBAF+ut3RbM9AcW8nyciJyw8ig@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPecUBTqbyiQQRdSPq_YuBAF+ut3RbM9AcW8nyciJyw8ig@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 10:13:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZDD0zTxBjfSfWXBsA=R2TSJ-J+nt+Y849QNipNhp7a5w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: Binding for MStar MSC313 GPIO controller
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 6:13 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:

> The generic GPIO controller dtschema got dropped because Rob wants it
> to be part of dtschema (outside of kernel) and then
> relicensing/rewriting property descriptions plays a role. Only the
> GPIO hogs went to common dtschema package.
>
> Therefore as of now, one should include all generic properties
> directly in the GPIO controller bindings.

Oh now I am confused.

Rob, what is the plan here?

Am I *not* to create say gpio-controller.yaml for $ref:in into
other controllers?

Yours,
Linus Walleij