Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:17:30 +0200
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To:     "Anand K. Mistry" <amistry@google.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree
Message-ID: <20201105091730.GW4879@kernel.org>
References: <20201105174549.614c2de4@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20201105070311.GU4879@kernel.org>
 <CAATStaMD=w+onf==L-=MQ7suJf6EaNoup5o8yW-TEbfajkbdaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAATStaMEn_CSfvc=JTawGhL8yt3L0cci8XK9ru+F6RGzRcYJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAATStaMEn_CSfvc=JTawGhL8yt3L0cci8XK9ru+F6RGzRcYJ7A@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:45:04PM +1100, Anand K. Mistry wrote:
> SNIPPED
> 
> > >
> > > Looks like left column became too wide, so rather than shift the right
> > > column to the right, I'd suggest to drop underscores in Speculation*.
> >
> > Hm. That makes it inconsistent with Speculation_Store_Bypass. I guess
> > it's the lesser of two evils.
> 
> Oh, do you mean renaming the existing Speculation_Store_Bypass? I
> thought that was a big no-no for the kernel?

Right, renaming is not an option :)

I thought Speculation_Store_Bypass was also introduced by the same
patch, sorry about the confusion. 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.