Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp344437pxb; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 01:19:21 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwe7whalUyPOlmuW1ZJeKOnxgoptKjEjYZs39ZoZ/q7EpjGgthDDN9DqWS6r3890ukgUhwW X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1c99:: with SMTP id cy25mr1570212edb.283.1604567960900; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:19:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604567960; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VpQvIgohl6Q9ues/HumHMEwP5A3AngLFqppev8wK8NZHSmq/bBtBAeqyrtnsQrZI0J Vin+5Pf5SjJzzNDepUJFslcNwyP3kAc/TW1bdApnJ3Q++0xidNPQ8+JOwtBV9iQTy2w+ 8wcKmd0mFHrVMS4SGH4bm+jpgXU4AgIq3ZEZlKFB1kJuUPz0RkqYz6U9OQcWZf24EtYY 21j1KuVbhjNXkxyS0n6UHs0L9T+tCj/w9kGL+gC7V/Jzoe9vIXmvMBStLuuvKu9dVC+Q Q7QpIrySSHFAi0rJLAtu3v49cGfVj5QFYRmYH2q1A+Tz58LvIJRpwRKVeUX9DgB1XKqj Z6zw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=kfF4nMku66uVipEU8bAtNusI2F97m+7Pj6tWJGHl/yE=; b=jeo+lh4Fi2j4tOCsuYBNsF80FbAg9Ri403fqYgkG+2EDwuKLxnHLRZAGQCAs3Tklmf ZHu28nLcY/4KDOeej4Oo9OSw/j1XtkRfhGH99y7qbxsG5k5rRy+kiEs1Vs4LsvfMC9PN s5H3bHJ8Y73pM316ZVufRPe3wK1bY6ACXLgbhJSgL3uTYuEx8jvyykkZTDALCgIHUw8T kMEfcoO0PxqGqcRu+Lb9/3y5puoRYghWnCSW+Ilau5pY5ILDB/D9y9eLa+w3aujJ91c2 O/qou0KW4paWwOdVDIxE/EaBmPv7/NsPEBo2nsrvvNgQ3c9Z+A2Cw/LOp8WMYfGUkmwy J82A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=hMLbUMcA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u26si624103edd.532.2020.11.05.01.18.58; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:19:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=hMLbUMcA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730061AbgKEJRj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 04:17:39 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55400 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726152AbgKEJRi (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2020 04:17:38 -0500 Received: from kernel.org (unknown [2.55.183.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E99BE2071A; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 09:17:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1604567858; bh=I573k6QlJy3XTSysKWkuF7joOCnf6HO0CmWainydeUg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=hMLbUMcAdOyKwfGgZ3j2w1dq9FPs5VB17aZTFuL1Y0mJvEnw+TMQnmjhAR64FQnui fR4lcIgNbkhOoqdkOu8msn8aFRMkIy9CbGSVNvVbshDYjZc7GqbwFLIMNxSD71Tjhv 9BmRx3FMbBs3kzvclkWpIdNeBBSHfHoXssGP7qCs= Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 11:17:30 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: "Anand K. Mistry" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm-current tree Message-ID: <20201105091730.GW4879@kernel.org> References: <20201105174549.614c2de4@canb.auug.org.au> <20201105070311.GU4879@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:45:04PM +1100, Anand K. Mistry wrote: > SNIPPED > > > > > > > Looks like left column became too wide, so rather than shift the right > > > column to the right, I'd suggest to drop underscores in Speculation*. > > > > Hm. That makes it inconsistent with Speculation_Store_Bypass. I guess > > it's the lesser of two evils. > > Oh, do you mean renaming the existing Speculation_Store_Bypass? I > thought that was a big no-no for the kernel? Right, renaming is not an option :) I thought Speculation_Store_Bypass was also introduced by the same patch, sorry about the confusion. -- Sincerely yours, Mike.