Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201023003338.1285642-1-david.m.ertman@intel.com>
 <20201023003338.1285642-2-david.m.ertman@intel.com> <CAPcyv4i9s=CsO5VJOhPnS77K=bD0LTQ8TUAbhLd+0OmyU8YQ3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201105094719.GQ5429@unreal> <CAPcyv4hmBhkFjSA2Q_p=Ss40CLFs86N7FugJOpq=sZ-NigoSRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201105202214.GA1339091@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201105202214.GA1339091@kroah.com>
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Nov 2020 12:24:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4j0Xih_wd5R8KYmWv6ty-WKxVbV54HZqr81+UqSm96LzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] Add auxiliary bus support
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
        Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Fred Oh <fred.oh@linux.intel.com>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>,
        "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@intel.com>,
        "Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 12:21 PM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 09:12:51AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Per above SPDX is v2 only, so...
> > >
> > > Isn't it default for the Linux kernel?
> >
> > SPDX eliminated the need to guess a default, and MODULE_LICENSE("GPL")
> > implies the "or later" language. The only default assumption is that
> > the license is GPL v2 compatible, those possibilities are myriad, but
> > v2-only is the first preference.
>
> No, MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") does not imply "or later" at all.  Please see
> include/linux/module.h, it means "GPL version 2".
>

Oh, I did, and stopped before getting to:

  "only/or later" distinction is completely irrelevant and does neither
 *replace the proper license identifiers in the corresponding source file

...sorry for the noise.