Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Adding I2C support to RX6110 RTC
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc:     Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Henning Schild <henning.schild@siemens.com>,
        Johannes Hahn <johannes-hahn@siemens.com>
References: <20201104102629.3422048-1-ch@denx.de>
 <20201105221451.GH1034841@piout.net>
From:   Claudius Heine <ch@denx.de>
Organization: Denx Software Engineering
Message-ID: <69f2396b-c81d-fe65-eb91-3c7a86c8d769@denx.de>
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:51:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201105221451.GH1034841@piout.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Alex,

On 2020-11-05 23:14, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello Claudius!
> 
> It has been a while ;)

yeah, lots of downstream stuff for me :/

> 
> On 04/11/2020 11:26:27+0100, Claudius Heine wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this patch introduces I2C support to the RX6110 RTC driver and also adds
>> an ACPI identifier to it.
>>
>> Since we are also pushing the coreboot changes for the ACPI table
>> upstream in parallel, we are free to name this ACPI entry however we
>> like it seems. So any feedback on that would be welcome ;)
>>
> 
> I don't care too much about ACPI so if you are really looking for advice
> there, I guess you should ask seom of the ACPI guys (but I guess you are
> free to choose whatever you want).

As Henning said, we are also getting feedback from the coreboot people.

See you hopefully soon again, when all this sitting at home is over.

regards,
Claudius