Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1088955pxb; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 00:05:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzR3/HQSJNgvgGG0qIiM7Tb5oINXJTsVR5jak1a6kMZdwe+DMx7a0RfYRpUM1UFZW1czwBl X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c90d:: with SMTP id b13mr856277edt.136.1604649941188; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:05:41 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604649941; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XMCESCAYGymsXbfIakm8qUzM724oXj/LxPGmkEuQo95MZW6gXVsPcWHMlc3f3aPfEv m8FFOXu1VYukJOtP9nzWj/PAFXT8Lfa4kRVqICUN+RGrRB9TN+XwmBFjT2o9hUI2MmwS 2tQtpIIqxYxJC0kRZhynFWiWOI7/0uzMLINaub+YvDpnGZ6XbLhUzYRCcduJRQ6H2M+o TTmhb6ee389RirossIUEsvPIxB1gz1U8+QpxvMa2bEETCBfTa8o/c5dz865hYkZCDhsU i1iSLuthQYjQGXDHSjymr3Ba9sDi44QiIFgSiadlVI9XDm8ZI3OIbcMoXR2kVmFc2U9c drEg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=IKUgmMif9IbaFkxGOMyHzePb8dfi3T+rZMXPjIuik9Q=; b=VyniXfcdVuQDdlVWTF1Higt8Nmgw6WmcfwPbdbdMeADiKGZGptkRoSF5D8K6H18zCg v78blP/5uMP7RWYs2bC6ndfqVZt0M89cC3zkI47QrcS90LjgD/a0EPibpJnYESaDk9IT C5rgWHEPqQ5Fq45oGBK2J+IakZ3duE4YytWrJ8z+9bYK5IviPJeeZW29MzcinJQKR6Oa TWU7wfNhPUxjI3iNZrYzhYKprfgnzG81QC/ua6IYLMe38E5Zvu8Kn/1+1jf04EQ8jol9 RR3ErG4jv6NMWF2zMbZ6RtsbdI0DrmqKQxs6JRjo+U0kv0hrDVeYPGsJUcukaB6nQrYP e+Pw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bt15si333186ejb.170.2020.11.06.00.05.18; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:05:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=siemens.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726419AbgKFIDA (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 03:03:00 -0500 Received: from goliath.siemens.de ([192.35.17.28]:57246 "EHLO goliath.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725848AbgKFIDA (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 03:03:00 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1334 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 03:02:58 EST Received: from mail1.sbs.de (mail1.sbs.de [192.129.41.35]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A67eZj0022080 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:40:35 +0100 Received: from md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net ([139.22.116.104]) by mail1.sbs.de (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0A67eZ1W031851; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:40:35 +0100 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:40:34 +0100 From: Henning Schild To: Alexandre Belloni Cc: Claudius Heine , Alessandro Zummo , , , Johannes Hahn , werner.zeh@siemens.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Adding I2C support to RX6110 RTC Message-ID: <20201106084034.0ea09ea3@md1za8fc.ad001.siemens.net> In-Reply-To: <20201105221451.GH1034841@piout.net> References: <20201104102629.3422048-1-ch@denx.de> <20201105221451.GH1034841@piout.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Am Thu, 5 Nov 2020 23:14:51 +0100 schrieb Alexandre Belloni : > Hello Claudius! > > It has been a while ;) > > On 04/11/2020 11:26:27+0100, Claudius Heine wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this patch introduces I2C support to the RX6110 RTC driver and also > > adds an ACPI identifier to it. > > > > Since we are also pushing the coreboot changes for the ACPI table > > upstream in parallel, we are free to name this ACPI entry however we > > like it seems. So any feedback on that would be welcome ;) > > > > I don't care too much about ACPI so if you are really looking for > advice there, I guess you should ask seom of the ACPI guys (but I > guess you are free to choose whatever you want). > This is the coreboot stuff currently under review. https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/47235 Henning