Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1172473pxb; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 02:58:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXku+sQ4DLZ1MH8qd7KNtVqcGc34Pwfsi5LINWVTLqExJmKhzME3V6RAsM+zYhsgmYd9ua X-Received: by 2002:a50:baea:: with SMTP id x97mr1381585ede.81.1604660289017; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 02:58:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604660289; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BpfmbOiN5I/3TUQEuVlanVylnkCQ2E9gZmzSROj9aBlbtDrJwSay4iYec99KKIaRGn npYaaygnkwuZDZKZ9A8hJ3NjHIDrQ8aqh7pQ5Sz2b85A1noiDNS+SDa9jmuZiLebJWwg WPTEvQei38hmNOXJltw8WuR8qHOnJFKGJ0bHvXKYjXJo5lgTTXTpDQ5I9nXduw5LMmAz 1T5OkomR1Yfql9/T8OdCQbPIcSiY822T4wtbZY4dpuwzH8ZPLN0rbDQ2q41IDTQ0oFLn hzuy72nky9sXfqFcLGGs0XB1d9r4+KRed7QggDzv+DYN/bbW6PXAGVEMQtTtPn9iIYYN XAPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=es4u9/e7Vn99lgivjHXKxppXEBISxLGGyGPZQTfdm4E=; b=IVbgUHOEMfeU3vUjY9VT/OgSG4ucHakvUtaOKGgPh44IKCieRT3eg84YCHy7Pj5JfC lpW8ojJFFa22iJE5XxJgxTLZxcUq1SApf7GlE2gZOjYRHz5D6I6I8TAdn9GF4wyiR0qO itRq9EKPfqKZg5XQb/ACZn0fnfK1iveWI5yu6Gsxc+VH+D/zD5OKOh3HKMLW40sHMjsb XC9KsnNMJIBtVxHI5iyQqB4T0OJemY8FWjeTV/IBQvtC7ZuurAF7FHLsTIyJMP8eU7yn qyltQm4e2s5V3qWsjPWegd6LWeYQEcNPqR3eC182tMA4d+g9bE9+NjGqKY/wGDoYTuQe NE6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dj4si688943edb.64.2020.11.06.02.57.46; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 02:58:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727194AbgKFKyG (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:54:06 -0500 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:41183 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727139AbgKFKx4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:53:56 -0500 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1kazNR-0000vt-04; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 11:53:53 +0100 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29ADAC4DDA; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:53:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:53:22 +0100 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Zou Wei Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/hugetlb: Make is_aligned_hugepage_range static Message-ID: <20201106105322.GF9806@alpha.franken.de> References: <1603937600-53015-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1603937600-53015-1-git-send-email-zou_wei@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:13:20AM +0800, Zou Wei wrote: > Fix the following sparse warning: > > arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c:64:5: warning: > symbol 'is_aligned_hugepage_range' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot > Signed-off-by: Zou Wei > --- > arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c > index 77ffece..774c988 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c > +++ b/arch/mips/mm/hugetlbpage.c > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ pte_t *huge_pte_offset(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, > /* > * This function checks for proper alignment of input addr and len parameters. > */ > -int is_aligned_hugepage_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len) > +static int is_aligned_hugepage_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long len) this should give then a warning that 'is_aligned_hugepage_range' is unused. Could you send a patch, which remove function completely ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]