Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1271714pxb; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:43:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBO4prLQLaROxJzLqKHweU0Wt6QaL1BRROtoRu8PNCKQ4CvpX1cXxrUMwdzqGREvZuLJRe X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:cc4c:: with SMTP id mm12mr2157999ejb.141.1604670197518; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:43:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604670197; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=MKFgAEWxXkH3H3UoFTW5eVn5WqpRv0R5lAf3TzNCboF3cByn+e2XHQqTgBCDZmHw/O inYgyKTXLULvKBB6YBtqk+GzWNMGBF1wvCroRD0YfWt8DqkSO00cpFbWC2r6/9ePthou QagSIWIB0nfz653I/tc0fCPVX3hPzD56mRo+Ja6RopLVnrw+89Z676nAR8C0W5sSGO35 VtBf9LQ5kceiafqiCj/SNhHE3vuBdgQurK4JuMf9jTHyANEEH67u15SlWz74RUIqRWw5 saO1MdA/gbZ/Z7iBkDWMx2aLTZm04+46myILN731HBqAC+FYm6/prfocOxon3etZKa8r qLNw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=YxlySBEtfM8plnPwR3qjjCyIfVvwbfiGqCyLIXMcAVY=; b=zrzKYWVeFzI5Tj/HkLCwyr7icvVf31zlByMb+5GYcBICUcUEp1WCT8mLw+25EklARv neTD1DEpx5GHq6AeePfTlt5koxJjeNXeh3pjoVDoScjqu0U8+e1hVCuWof8xoE1G/jMQ +0IcEF8q9O187IWa1UeDxRuOrEQUiMRFeaRYtIW07Eu7UlyYaWjkBX/3rp7RDwYu5uJZ 0tm3+wJcyAR2ySHx/yB0RxPeuDn/G5LDTTQav03iBBv4tAH5OTTlIct5S15Sv54WQfOy rMpCRMVLeqPwM4C9NwImxmOcgsjN6dMvHv9vv2/OFg7ZyUxvWHx8kwWSNj79CGqW8KIe rt0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bNf+JFTJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w14si591974ejn.30.2020.11.06.05.42.55; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bNf+JFTJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727479AbgKFNlT (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:41:19 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36418 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726708AbgKFNlS (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:41:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x644.google.com (mail-ej1-x644.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::644]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C823C0613CF; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 05:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x644.google.com with SMTP id k3so1952187ejj.10; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:41:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YxlySBEtfM8plnPwR3qjjCyIfVvwbfiGqCyLIXMcAVY=; b=bNf+JFTJi7loW9QoZYLAj1mxw3CAaxrBETbasN+Ksr6IIFCVZiJMenzWRn6BdIG2XL LE/DALyZRKTHE60zpb6rAGkpZS6ag4kod9Asip/bpyt1ceCPadTaepJK+Gfa90DfJA+K 4kyTY7NRg33tum1uhTSN3RxZYArP87cMPJc/Ey8qgbT4UjgPCbUkb2txF28Io8BM66m0 QJg9/oupqK9QNybaSr+lQoGE6U7DltDxFzsFb2C5GdrkTTaolp386Psm1DmeKWJOkDYo T+6SOSVHbmE67mhYkgbO2p1yXjMNl7d7gmvfb/yWOBvoTyT0IQeOw7ugR5S1p/uEdY3h 0fJQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YxlySBEtfM8plnPwR3qjjCyIfVvwbfiGqCyLIXMcAVY=; b=cvKnb1r469TwJzl4GFVmKxS6wXLC90/AQ15XpREwMzO40N8o05KBlS9v0cIgYED9W+ YekD3JZTlrcEIba/Sh96uuiHTPnb6MDNbltMmlQTwoJuOW8ltb+7Wq2IzmiQMWJDxxvf Whj6B7qwmaJ+5wjVuM/9iUgKdztQU0e5nE3ufRIu9HJ8Gwl4LgIkYv4Ipo9+tQyyYL8Q ndcg8jrDU+PMVb/IS5l4rFjg7XeAkmLhLfKFG+YrX9w1Fhl65+jeOxA0suYZWoFFQJ5M Z8NTubrIanwGtjM9xjUMokBu78E79dNAJp+hIKvMGQjpi43ztZJabUh8dRQviT7KxqOk suSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339TKOxzNcnh24+IVjzt/TBZUMZBkKj25VlRjm9CQSaQe7+kMqf 0Goxf3+fyAo7eRCAqlJORF2JC2rvjrGwris+WzU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6d83:: with SMTP id h3mr2014952ejt.481.1604670076814; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 05:41:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201104234427.26477-1-digetx@gmail.com> <20201104234427.26477-18-digetx@gmail.com> <6fa54ce6-d5ae-d04f-7c77-b62c148d92b7@gmail.com> <20201106061513.uyys7njcqcdlah67@vireshk-i7> In-Reply-To: From: Frank Lee Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 21:41:05 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 17/30] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Support OPP and core voltage scaling To: Dmitry Osipenko Cc: Viresh Kumar , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Alan Stern , Peter Chen , Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Adrian Hunter , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Lee Jones , =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= , Ulf Hansson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Rob Herring , Marek Szyprowski , Peter Geis , Nicolas Chauvet , driver-dev , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc , DTML , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, "open list:SECURE DIGITAL HO..." , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:18 PM Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > > 06.11.2020 09:15, Viresh Kumar =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > > Setting regulators for count as 0 doesn't sound good to me. > > > > But, I understand that you don't want to have that if (have_regulator) > > check, and it is a fair request. What I will instead do is, allow all > > dev_pm_opp_put*() API to start accepting a NULL pointer for the OPP > > table and fail silently. And so you won't be required to have this > > unwanted check. But you will be required to save the pointer returned > > back by dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(), which is the right thing to do > > anyways. > > Perhaps even a better variant could be to add a devm versions of the OPP > API functions, then drivers won't need to care about storing the > opp_table pointer if it's unused by drivers. I think so. The consumer may not be so concerned about the status of these OPP tables. If the driver needs to manage the release, it needs to add a pointer to their driver global structure. Maybe it's worth having these devm interfaces for opp. Yangtao