Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1401328pxb; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:44:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdxlrcYXnoZFeTWhUDw5vbKAt64gV77S9piImwILCMwDLc6fsK/UXOw3rQhTDSQaR+sNJl X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2444:: with SMTP id a4mr2987390ejb.415.1604681046242; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:44:06 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604681046; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=l1cY3Mk93eYEl28HR86e5mSTcJ3yciJAi/naYOagf002t9twfcFCU3vMyj3buEWxmi nY7f0WD4pjnqQg8eSwTQtQl7yc3cI7YCKqmwlsZW1jjyFhoyizPFVBbYfRHda5ZTaf/e WKFAj+3TgSJGtLJ5wf/mq4v1En6ijUQwGTYfk8gZxMdZLEfUFi6uSCz7EUEdtI6tYE+i jFhSmtXM5Gi8s19HNceMIiIYKYUPwHTFTKQ8kUMeyzRs5iqQMVy2K+vKqdXZz+WxJWME 24pQBuzVXwPRL37izk3XbLlP9NjqPcYX4unyqbcTLPRFKMmh3/cR6InnOGsQaXUZT+Du QGcA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=E8ZXU1sB2LM2Qvs2eXs5LsyiKHVfmc6ejsqLG55A13A=; b=NDHWvUt2447pFQw+Id18M7+556i7KrDprzowR/gLyBfbxC5qj1Ve45d5oOC3cEHB1D FROr0oXV8VxwBfp6P6VxIU3LYl2XhfcYkV1sNX3zgQ3Con3RnbiOBQhkHu6VEA+2D55y rC8DSfx0ErV076MGBTZOy8JaFgrK3pxMDqB9Izh/zgl4eJJ0euEY0+XWi6vqXmN0K0xa Ap6YXINOj0f6l87Dj9CzZv/0bX2JukB3mTvHrmnG9gOLQU5n+UhLkRFgmO8JQdq5I6at sjiIvzCKmirEA/P48jBTbMVIbLXxS+TfM6nThTjeTmLHOyhcz4Gu/T5JrhqxCxJAZBnX CPUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Qr1okamu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l1si1362513edv.3.2020.11.06.08.43.42; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Qr1okamu; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727497AbgKFQjh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:39:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35918 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726320AbgKFQjg (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2020 11:39:36 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0EC8C0613CF; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id f38so1351798pgm.2; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:39:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=E8ZXU1sB2LM2Qvs2eXs5LsyiKHVfmc6ejsqLG55A13A=; b=Qr1okamuqR2eM6OvhTiZaB1uMByc4kz2azxSxjYXj7w6VJkeBVZ+8D7nLbRocKH1nJ +tBW5Yr7EwvXgytTEqI1U5PIygNKwCcaMiSMB9hfcQZ+XURWefz7vIKgUWLwGeNamlX5 Xn9z/b9uINKgQMnTPcXiNx8TXwxeh8ocUxiPdKDXwZMTzRTXyE4iMbgu8sOQIkBqU4Gw 7aTbQy1GH42h07P1h9KLl2lLepqcUXzpMleFzUR3S4bUSdvsXsovE23tCEraEwiyVgNY JWnopqBhVroT1NFvHrUvs13n7PurmApxT2XLBWgjuE4Jx4rXvf0WhEvXp7Ktki/kyKF4 0DDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=E8ZXU1sB2LM2Qvs2eXs5LsyiKHVfmc6ejsqLG55A13A=; b=TIGGiB3Zq1US7ScQ8rRks50Rf1hT8v6++AcPB6rYUFb9zZXDVZIu71dRn0Bi9emZX8 9equmOTR9wYM2nuDUg59lxBQd8RGR7LQtVWhcx7A/RjfgtGh5qOwdZfNhRdD+SMCZgq4 i20Tvbl0PK8JNqcA57T71EjmQQVC5hTIbqKSwXQbKwYFVYXNgsdVkGty1FDUikiB2Y+B /6p8IgaDGMqzdzjbC6JMFmeT41aX9Ym2ZWEPX07Ws3ipYyLYGnATRPzCbnF3HkoRXP6D bRd3Co/BLb3q4DpUINzd6MOtWN5VmMFO6bFpsRfw0Ah86eWSVBTKU9tL2RE1tbM49mun zO6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aMcWSBqpH4zd3taHkZqzFSeU/DOpzQBB4eTtmQwgQEpOwV/dT D5/qZbQ8qUn7E9G4h8ZGpBCX/FSp7OQ= X-Received: by 2002:a63:2051:: with SMTP id r17mr2355935pgm.191.1604680775583; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.230.28.234] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v27sm2674776pfi.204.2020.11.06.08.39.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Nov 2020 08:39:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/dsa: remove unused macros to tame gcc warning To: Andrew Lunn , Alex Shi Cc: Vivien Didelot , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1604641050-6004-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <20201106141820.GP933237@lunn.ch> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: <24690741-cc10-eec1-33c6-7960c8b7fac6@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 08:39:34 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201106141820.GP933237@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/6/2020 6:18 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 01:37:30PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> There are some macros unused, they causes much gcc warnings. Let's >> remove them to tame gcc. >> >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:51:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_SWITCH" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:53:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_MIRROR" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:55:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_TC_MASK" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:35:0: warning: macro "BRCM_IG_TS_SHIFT" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:46:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_MASK" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:49:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_PROT_SNOOP" is not >> used [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:34:0: warning: macro "BRCM_IG_TE_MASK" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:43:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_CID_MASK" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:50:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_PROT_TERM" is not >> used [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:54:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_TC_SHIFT" is not used >> [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:52:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_MAC_LEARN" is not >> used [-Wunused-macros] >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c:48:0: warning: macro "BRCM_EG_RC_EXCEPTION" is not >> used [-Wunused-macros] >> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi >> Cc: Andrew Lunn >> Cc: Vivien Didelot >> Cc: Florian Fainelli >> Cc: Vladimir Oltean >> Cc: "David S. Miller" >> Cc: Jakub Kicinski >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> --- >> net/dsa/tag_brcm.c | 15 --------------- >> 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c b/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c >> index e934dace3922..ce23b5d4c6b8 100644 >> --- a/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c >> +++ b/net/dsa/tag_brcm.c >> @@ -30,29 +30,14 @@ >> /* 1st byte in the tag */ >> #define BRCM_IG_TC_SHIFT 2 >> #define BRCM_IG_TC_MASK 0x7 >> -/* 2nd byte in the tag */ >> -#define BRCM_IG_TE_MASK 0x3 >> -#define BRCM_IG_TS_SHIFT 7 >> /* 3rd byte in the tag */ >> #define BRCM_IG_DSTMAP2_MASK 1 >> #define BRCM_IG_DSTMAP1_MASK 0xff > > Hi Alex > > It is good to remember that there are multiple readers of source > files. There is the compiler which generates code from it, and there > is the human trying to understand what is going on, what the hardware > can do, how we could maybe extend the code in the future to make use > of bits are currently don't, etc. > > The compiler has no use of these macros, at the moment. But i as a > human do. It is valuable documentation, given that there is no open > datasheet for this hardware. > > I would say these warnings are bogus, and the code should be left > alone. Agreed, these definitions are intended to document what the hardware does. These warnings are getting too far. -- Florian