Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 6 Nov 2020 10:55:47 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] SPI fixes for v5.10-rc2
Message-ID: <20201106175547.GA2959494@ubuntu-m3-large-x86>
References: <20201105164607.AD20021734@mail.kernel.org>
 <20201106101815.GA1403068@ubuntu-m3-large-x86>
 <20201106110053.GA5532@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20201106110053.GA5532@sirena.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 11:00:53AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 03:18:15AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 04:45:46PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Martin Hundeb?ll (1):
> > >       spi: bcm2835: fix gpio cs level inversion
> 
> > Why did this go in with two outstanding reports?
> 
> > It looks like there is a fix for it now:
> 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-spi/20201105090615.620315-1-martin@geanix.com/
> 
> > Although I guess it is going to require a resend...
> 
> Erk, sorry - I remembered the issue being fixed but got confused and
> thought that it was an incremental patch on top of something applied
> rather than something that got fixed in a patch revision (got it
> confused with another issue I think).  The incremental fix is queued
> now, I should send it out later today.

No worries, I just wanted to make sure that you were still aware of the
issues with it. Obviously you have a lot on your plate constantly so it
is understandable that something falls through the cracks occasionally
:)

I see you have sent that pull already, thanks for the quick response!

Cheers,
Nathan