Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:23:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:23:19 -0500 Received: from tartarus.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.132.34]:962 "EHLO tartarus.telenet-ops.be") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:23:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 22:23:10 +0100 (CET) From: Dirk Moerenhout X-X-Sender: To: Mark Hahn Cc: Subject: Re: graphical swap comparison of aa and rik vm In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > also, if you merely sum the SI and SO columns for each: > sum(SI) sum(SO) sum(SI+SO) > Rik-VM 43564 317448 290032 > AA-VM 118284 171748 361012 > to me, this looks like the same point: Rik being SO-happy, > Andrea having to SI a lot more. interesting also that Andrea wins the race, > in spite of poorer SO choices and more swap traffic overall. Just cause I didn't see anybody mentioned it yet: your statement is not valid you switched the SI+SO values. It's 361012 for Rik-VM and 290032 for AA-VM (easy to see as SO for Rik-VM is higher than the sum for Rik-VM in your table ;-) ). So AA makes less swap traffic overall which does actually explain at least partially why it wins the race. Regards, Dirk Moerenhout ///// System Administrator ///// Planet Internet NV - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/