Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:04:02 +0200
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>,
        Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@oracle.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, asapek@google.com,
        cedric.xing@intel.com, chenalexchen@google.com,
        conradparker@google.com, cyhanish@google.com,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, haitao.huang@intel.com, kai.huang@intel.com,
        kai.svahn@intel.com, kmoy@google.com, ludloff@google.com,
        luto@kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, npmccallum@redhat.com,
        puiterwijk@redhat.com, rientjes@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
        yaozhangx@google.com, mikko.ylinen@intel.com,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v40 10/24] mm: Add 'mprotect' hook to struct
 vm_operations_struct
Message-ID: <20201106220402.GB55146@kernel.org>
References: <20201104145430.300542-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20201104145430.300542-11-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
 <20201106100409.GD3371@techsingularity.net>
 <20201106165107.GA52595@kernel.org>
 <20201106203725.GK14914@zn.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201106203725.GK14914@zn.tnic>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 09:37:25PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 06:51:07PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > Both comments make sense to me. I'll refine this patch on Monday and
> 
> And while you're at it, I'd suggest you refine the whole patchset and
> send a full v41 instead:
> 
> - please audit all your Reviewed-by, Acked-by tags as to for what
> versions of the patches they were given. If you've changed those patches
> in the meantime, then all those tags are invalid and need to go.
> 
> - work in all the change requests
> 
> - fix the order of the patches so that each one builds
> 
> so that they can be taken cleanly into tip.
> 
> Thx.

OK, everything else is clear except change requests part I want to
check.

There has been a change request to update callback that made perfect
sense to me. Is there something else that I might have missed? Just
checking.

> -- 
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
> 
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

/Jarkko