Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201029183526.2131776-1-aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201029183526.2131776-1-aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com>
From:   Aleksandr Nogikh <aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Nov 2020 22:06:27 +0300
Message-ID: <CAFSQ=y455bVOGMpRW86Gto+WdL1idxSXM0RPifokEotyg2ccjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] security: add fault injection to LSM hooks
To:     jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, akinobu.mita@gmail.com
Cc:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>, mortonm@chromium.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 21:35, Aleksandr Nogikh
<aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
>
> Fault injection capabilities[Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.rst]
> facilitate testing of the stability of the Linux kernel by providing
> means to force a number of kernel interfaces to return error
> codes. This patch series proposes adding such fault injection
> capability into LSM hooks.
>
> The intent is to make it possible to test whether the existing kernel
> code properly handles negative return values of LSM hooks. Syzbot
> [https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md] will
> automatically do that with the aid of instrumentation tools once these
> changes are merged.
> [...]

What tree should these changes go to?

Is there anyone else who is not on the recipient list but still might
be interested in the series?