Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751160AbWHTTMz (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:12:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751161AbWHTTMz (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:12:55 -0400 Received: from outpipe-village-512-1.bc.nu ([81.2.110.250]:8142 "EHLO lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751160AbWHTTMy (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:12:54 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits From: Alan Cox To: Willy Tarreau Cc: Solar Designer , Alex Riesen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060820190151.GP602@1wt.eu> References: <20060820003840.GA17249@openwall.com> <20060820100706.GB6003@steel.home> <20060820153037.GA20007@openwall.com> <1156097013.4051.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060820181025.GN602@1wt.eu> <1156099006.4051.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060820182137.GO602@1wt.eu> <1156099979.4051.45.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060820190151.GP602@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:33:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1156102407.4051.47.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.2 (2.6.2-1.fc5.5) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1123 Lines: 25 Ar Sul, 2006-08-20 am 21:01 +0200, ysgrifennodd Willy Tarreau: > 2.4 has no printk_ratelimit() function and I'm not sure it's worth adding > one for only this user. One could argue that once it's implemented, we can > uncomment some other warnings that are currently disabled due to lack of > ratelimit. Agreed. But if it isnt ratelimited then people will be able to use it flush other "interesting" log messages out of existance... > > In this special case (set*uid), the only reason we might fail is because > kmem_cache_alloc(uid_cachep, SLAB_KERNEL) would return NULL. Do you think > it could intentionnally be tricked into failing, or that under OOM we might > bother about the excess of messages ? > > If so I can backport the printk_ratelimit() function, I would just like an > advice on this. If there are multiple potential users then a backport might be sensible - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/