Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:14:55 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To:     Aleksandr Nogikh <aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com>
cc:     serge@hallyn.com, akinobu.mita@gmail.com,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@google.com>, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
        Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>, mortonm@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] security: add fault injection to LSM hooks
In-Reply-To: <CAFSQ=y455bVOGMpRW86Gto+WdL1idxSXM0RPifokEotyg2ccjg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2011101414330.30138@namei.org>
References: <20201029183526.2131776-1-aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com> <CAFSQ=y455bVOGMpRW86Gto+WdL1idxSXM0RPifokEotyg2ccjg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote:

> On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 21:35, Aleksandr Nogikh
> <aleksandrnogikh@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@google.com>
> >
> > Fault injection capabilities[Documentation/fault-injection/fault-injection.rst]
> > facilitate testing of the stability of the Linux kernel by providing
> > means to force a number of kernel interfaces to return error
> > codes. This patch series proposes adding such fault injection
> > capability into LSM hooks.
> >
> > The intent is to make it possible to test whether the existing kernel
> > code properly handles negative return values of LSM hooks. Syzbot
> > [https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot.md] will
> > automatically do that with the aid of instrumentation tools once these
> > changes are merged.
> > [...]
> 
> What tree should these changes go to?
> 

Mine, but more signoffs/acks are required.

> Is there anyone else who is not on the recipient list but still might
> be interested in the series?
> 

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>