Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   xiakaixu1987@gmail.com
To:     ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, kafai@fb.com,
        songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, andrii@kernel.org,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@chromium.org
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Fix unsigned 'datasec_id' compared with zero in check_pseudo_btf_id
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:50:19 +0800
Message-Id: <1605009019-22310-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Precedence: bulk

From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>

The unsigned variable datasec_id is assigned a return value from the call
to check_pseudo_btf_id(), which may return negative error code.

Fixes coccicheck warning:

./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9616:5-15: WARNING: Unsigned expression compared with zero: datasec_id > 0

Reported-by: Tosk Robot <tencent_os_robot@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 6200519582a6..e9d8d4309bb4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9572,7 +9572,7 @@ static int check_pseudo_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			       struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			       struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux)
 {
-	u32 datasec_id, type, id = insn->imm;
+	s32 datasec_id, type, id = insn->imm;
 	const struct btf_var_secinfo *vsi;
 	const struct btf_type *datasec;
 	const struct btf_type *t;
-- 
2.20.0