Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751779AbWHTWv1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:51:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751776AbWHTWv1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:51:27 -0400 Received: from bayc1-pasmtp04.bayc1.hotmail.com ([65.54.191.164]:24214 "EHLO BAYC1-PASMTP04.CEZ.ICE") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751765AbWHTWv0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:51:26 -0400 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [65.94.249.130] X-Originating-Email: [seanlkml@sympatico.ca] Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:51:23 -0400 From: Sean To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Greg KH , Adrian Bunk , Josh Boyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: Adrian Bunk is now taking over the 2.6.16-stable branch Message-Id: <20060820185123.e84fafaf.seanlkml@sympatico.ca> In-Reply-To: <20060820223046.GB10011@opteron.random> References: <20060803204921.GA10935@kroah.com> <625fc13d0608031943m7fb60d1dwb11092fb413f7fc3@mail.gmail.com> <20060804230017.GO25692@stusta.de> <20060806004634.GB6455@opteron.random> <20060806045234.GA28849@kroah.com> <20060820223046.GB10011@opteron.random> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.10.1; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Aug 2006 22:51:25.0995 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A9BE7B0:01C6C4AB] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1317 Lines: 28 On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:30:46 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I think it would be great to have the users choosing their preferred > maintainer to end the era of maintainers being decided by other > maintainers like you actually did. A simple website on kernel.org can > achieve it, where users can registers for voting and the maintainers > willing to maintain 2.6-stable can registers themself too. That's at > least less random than the current status if what you said above is > true and if 2.6.16-stable is meant to reach any critical mass. There's no need for a vote. Users already vote for a maintainer when they decide to use a paticular kernel tree. No user is forced to follow a particular maintainer. And anyone can step up and declare that they are also offering a maintained tree. And this situation is already self correcting; if no users follow, it's unlikely that a maintainer will continue doing the required work. And if a maintainer doesn't do a satisfactory job, it's very unlikely many people will choose to use that tree. Sean - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/