Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1602141333-17822-3-git-send-email-maninder1.s@samsung.com>
 <CAK8P3a2RYeNiTy9QmwFVKtFifXxWc9XfAT6ThPoSH9wGYsKGpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8P3a3eZjBVSuhv=Cx4aYC+E9tex+BbJH1b6YyMMief-mO7kQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201021124542.GL1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20201021125740.GM1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <CAK8P3a3s9JJpeBpH38utw9aA1VaEkcBqKEGtwcmoP1zS6xDj5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201109144549.GA26857@atomide.com> <CAK8P3a2tM1Gzy7Y98tiYGoNcLye77je_UCtTUQYcP2UuRNRKwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201110091904.GC26857@atomide.com> <CAK8P3a3dZMnEV-Sg_ep6_dQ3XEf73fEpCF0T03255KxMrJZH8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20201110120422.GE26857@atomide.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201110120422.GE26857@atomide.com>
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:35:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2Hh=-VtvCiztNDZvW=ssx5zbvbccYcLXSNUt=xF6mwwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm: introduce IRQ stacks
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        v.narang@samsung.com, a.sahrawat@samsung.com,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>,
        Jian Cai <caij2003@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
        Maninder Singh <maninder1.s@samsung.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 1:06 PM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:

> > Are these actually ARMv6? Most ARM11 cores you'd come across
> > in practice are ARMv6K (ARM1136r1, ARM1167, ARM11MPCore),
> > in particular every SoC that has any mainline support except for
> > the ARM1136r0 based OMAP2 and i.MX3.
>
> I've been only using smp_on_up for the ARMv6 ARM1136r0 variants
> for omap2, no SMP on those.

Obviously all SMP hardware is ARMv6K, the only question I raised
in point "c)" is what we would lose by making ARMv6 (ARM1136r0)
support and SMP mutually exclusive in a kernel configuration, and
I suppose the answer remains "testing".

      Arnd