Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:27:56 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
        =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@kmk-computers.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] ARM: dts: NSP: Fix Ethernet switch SGMII register
 name
Message-ID: <20201110222756.alaii5mr6fcwq4lx@skbuf>
References: <20201110033113.31090-1-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
 <20201110033113.31090-8-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201110033113.31090-8-f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 07:31:10PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> The register name should be "sgmii_config", not "sgmii", this is not a
> functional change since no code is currently looking for that register
> by name (or at all).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
> ---

I.e. no one calls devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 2), and even if
it did, the register name wouldn't matter.
...but at least it's documented that it should be called "sgmii_config".
And the address is the same as the one that's documented for the SGMII
register base in SoCs with "brcm,nsp-srab", so even without
documentation, it is pretty clear to me that it was a mistake calling it
simply "sgmii". And if that address is incorrect anyways, at least that
would be a separate issue.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>

>  arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> index e7d08959d5fe..09fd7e55c069 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ srab: ethernet-switch@36000 {
>  			reg = <0x36000 0x1000>,
>  			      <0x3f308 0x8>,
>  			      <0x3f410 0xc>;
> -			reg-names = "srab", "mux_config", "sgmii";
> +			reg-names = "srab", "mux_config", "sgmii_config";
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 95 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 96 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>  				     <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>