Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
IronPort-SDR: nHVZEGs2bRPUx5xcWSx+9a/ECaBZtVqIgd2gzyXxTPZL8uUX3bn1LfA7grhJgBvzp1jVebjaig
 l3LwXJINrURw==
IronPort-SDR: cMZtNvtN+8jSY8QwAHBtnpgpwlRODUadsCEbQXv8bBbstUNfw7kQj5BQ6o+50nP4z3C7T8JufN
 XakrnU77TVtg==
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/11] perf/x86: Fix variable types for LBR registers
To:     Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
References: <20200613080958.132489-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
 <20200613080958.132489-2-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
 <20201109063446.GM466880@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
From:   "Xu, Like" <like.xu@intel.com>
Message-ID: <f5847034-e720-b8ce-905b-04e2cfb7661b@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:14:02 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201109063446.GM466880@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

Hi Paolo,

As you may know, we have got host perf support in Linus' tree
which provides a clear path for enabling guest LBR,

will we merge the remaining LBR KVM patch set?

---

[PATCH RESEND v13 00/10] Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20201030035220.102403-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com/

Thanks,
Like Xu

On 2020/11/9 14:34, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the status of this patchkit? It would be quite useful to me (and
> various other people) to use LBRs in guest. I reviewed it earlier and the
> patches all looked good to me.  But i don't see it in any -next tree.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen<ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> Could it please be merged?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Andi