Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp177515pxb; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:21:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx05UI4jn3KIcd+RLCmx3N5b7rqdvqpqLXluZELWWG7S1nvbbSzHuj+5M4wpmFdeyLzOXZ6 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:da81:: with SMTP id q1mr25141956eds.14.1605082913008; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:21:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605082913; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=UfMY5CyWFbR/w+7ATCWlac1zgeUxz6NbqbUmRPCbEOJEXxhEzjINl6PVjuyCXF1jTf SoT8MQQd0QYJVQcWs84hXiMRk2Iw9PD0vw2HWPjnJGk/PPEDVnavurmq6abwyJhZh6bG xDh4e4axfL+81ns6D4yZ5C4LFA6Twh832kCZRCbHUuCuBPMF3O1TW9Av7BVqn8MhWn5h J7KM0N0lqNvwlV+UWQq91vstkEd7Vz1Z+z7MWR7wPLKzKBcIp4d11neroOCHDYKAel25 zyo+3cFCj+RvS+sRLGkfMv2S+oEC+voI/9iijKygyNTTv7/O9XsngneT1T8Ob13AQvat 50fg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=qyCZne5cZpLNOqDry4HVxqltreV+5uSXk934/wIueCQ=; b=d9YjGU8m/z71srV5Hnh5nALpgifKft3LaYLZNveK4aQKVTa3kV49Ri4NKCyUrWR7g0 mYYJeVKC7MWSnX3aHgdhYsd5OvDcXphMqrFBQgoF86LPFyM6db84YsQbNazxR1hGCX45 x9eY8lVAYWoYYnqbRA+vCsU64TkKskXc7RiRswPNRoqv/GSrZme+sAnHRWvI3UGF/TUa Y8q0nRAhBnhYxX2yW2zRIvqqCIOD8wnx8aEgI9phqGDjW/yxVepLa7l1I0iOuSbAoSsJ lA3Fv6ZRI3gXG5F+nX6rjjbeHFiIx1NNGq1IJATmu0CxMG57Wgy+ettEdlyBJYHfuaef kYxA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LkrweCrN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id se23si838890ejb.220.2020.11.11.00.21.29; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:21:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LkrweCrN; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726137AbgKKIRd (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:17:33 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59766 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725860AbgKKIRc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:17:32 -0500 Received: from mail-vk1-xa44.google.com (mail-vk1-xa44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a44]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37AE2C0613D1; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:17:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk1-xa44.google.com with SMTP id b190so308417vka.0; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:17:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qyCZne5cZpLNOqDry4HVxqltreV+5uSXk934/wIueCQ=; b=LkrweCrNctWBJmZhOmVK1Rzbd5NVaaKQuUZ7ogoTkNLtcKS1qRptELkjFKxAoo/BW0 P35onUOxdrqcVXzz35VtvWEvfj38Gdbm+Bdv/lwhCcDrizl6PzXh9JlZJrdPeYOs/ybe cwY7GQAwEF7/Mg2wY4aoFKT97vFprivkS5vVY4PuA8xcoo0iyfTevwWEIupadrC6yQQX spp3O5rZ/q1Wx4AE+znuA+rOIR+kZy1SYrJYXh7+Yk1TCx2/dj6tB0ZLia4HA+GPSsSW b5eXL06oey9MVpiBqb43EKDBlW5ai1A2WseVlAgbIFfOcDrT8Svl/de7lOLaM8arvWRP Vrng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qyCZne5cZpLNOqDry4HVxqltreV+5uSXk934/wIueCQ=; b=iZx/C0f3QvYOpcWKQ3sLK+1uOPyZyq88OJASlHxfKd9YuwDqddgQiKtptk38/kQ9lC eDMMggGYcqJa7IB9PfTedWeUghEwEHRwwJeZ4Cp+UeM6MxuoJHudV43n1poX4ZXgqlTV dZcaE28RmeD4xYMaXTVamFpv7l/XfUj82IdibCMxKHqMUXEa64gUmgLBCGfrkJ1vwqtL XBScSDiRTcbynAE33UGwr8bf3MjofGQY1ps1PzbAoW4d9+l8HWdYc0BofBMjhdTCgBKs pHG9CTpf1wl91yS4r9yeNF7KRI5aaRbRusoyXxSy81IqzPk+hfvMpegft/YKHHQXw29p vUPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531r3hoJqWeu/JD6swwGhi7dJ6SWoYNyFqqLkuzepeebjjZSKSaz /14onc2/IHD3/rWHlyelfq8vQ/QgQbsP0TmnVc8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:84f:: with SMTP id 15mr9455291vkk.25.1605082649083; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:17:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1604566549-62481-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> <1604566549-62481-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: <1604566549-62481-8-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> From: huang ying Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 16:17:17 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 07/19] mm: page_idle_get_page() does not need lru_lock To: Alex Shi Cc: Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , Tejun Heo , Hugh Dickins , khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com, willy@infradead.org, Johannes Weiner , lkp@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt , iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, kirill@shutemov.name, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, kernel test robot , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , shy828301@gmail.com, Vlastimil Babka , Minchan Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 4:56 PM Alex Shi wrote: > > From: Hugh Dickins > > It is necessary for page_idle_get_page() to recheck PageLRU() after > get_page_unless_zero(), but holding lru_lock around that serves no > useful purpose, and adds to lru_lock contention: delete it. > > See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20150504031722.GA2768@blaptop for the > discussion that led to lru_lock there; but __page_set_anon_rmap() now > uses WRITE_ONCE(), and I see no other risk in page_idle_clear_pte_refs() > using rmap_walk() (beyond the risk of racing PageAnon->PageKsm, mostly > but not entirely prevented by page_count() check in ksm.c's > write_protect_page(): that risk being shared with page_referenced() and > not helped by lru_lock). > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Vladimir Davydov > Cc: Vlastimil Babka > Cc: Minchan Kim > Cc: Alex Shi > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > mm/page_idle.c | 4 ---- > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/page_idle.c b/mm/page_idle.c > index 057c61df12db..64e5344a992c 100644 > --- a/mm/page_idle.c > +++ b/mm/page_idle.c > @@ -32,19 +32,15 @@ > static struct page *page_idle_get_page(unsigned long pfn) > { > struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn); > - pg_data_t *pgdat; > > if (!page || !PageLRU(page) || > !get_page_unless_zero(page)) > return NULL; > > - pgdat = page_pgdat(page); > - spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); get_page_unless_zero() is a full memory barrier. But do we need a compiler barrier here to prevent the compiler to cache PageLRU() results here? Otherwise looks OK to me, Acked-by: "Huang, Ying" Best Regards, Huang, Ying > if (unlikely(!PageLRU(page))) { > put_page(page); > page = NULL; > } > - spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock); > return page; > } > > -- > 1.8.3.1 > >