Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:39:34 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
        Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc:     kernel@pengutronix.de, David Jander <david@protonic.nl>,
        linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20201027095724.18654-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
References: <20201027095724.18654-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] SPI/ Input: ads7846: properly handle spi->mode flags
Message-Id: <160520996934.38820.11231057129543889479.b4-ty@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 10:57:22 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> changes v2:
> - add SPI_MODE_X_MASK macro
> - ads7846: clear SPI_MODE_X_MASK bits to set driver specific mode.
> 
> Oleksij Rempel (2):
>   spi: introduce SPI_MODE_X_MASK macro
>   Input: ads7846: do not overwrite spi->mode flags set by spi framework
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] Input: ads7846: do not overwrite spi->mode flags set by spi framework
      commit: 376ccca853fdb9959f7ac5185a428a9f91e71e86

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark