Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: Kconfig: Drop ARM64 SoC specific configs
To:     Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>
Cc:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Yuti Amonkar <yamonkar@cadence.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
        Swapnil Jakhade <sjakhade@cadence.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
References: <20201026170624.24241-1-nm@ti.com>
 <d741c4d0-9e76-99de-7081-10f3a7a5cb1a@ti.com>
 <20201026190808.im4nb32jn4rd3xhu@crayon>
 <20201112215600.npr4g24gt4tvc5tm@kahuna>
From:   santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Message-ID: <4b23cb5b-b1c9-34b9-2bdf-4f9c2df9ad0d@oracle.com>
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:59:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201112215600.npr4g24gt4tvc5tm@kahuna>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11/12/20 1:56 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:08-20201026, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 23:30-20201026, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> [..]
>>> ➜  linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:961:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC=y
>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:7:config ARCH_K3_AM6_SOC
>>> ➜  linux git:(master) git grep -in ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC
>>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig:962:CONFIG_ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC=y
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/cadence/Kconfig:16:  depends on ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC ||
>>> COMPILE_TEST
>>> drivers/soc/ti/Kconfig:12:config ARCH_K3_J721E_SOC
>>>
>>>
>>> I see drm bridge Kconfig is cleaned[0]. Please clean the defconfig as well.
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$
>>>
>>
>> Yes, the defconfig patches have to be queued up in a different queue,
>> Lets see where the two patches fall and will post the defconfig
>> updates as well.
> 
> 
> Santosh,
> 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20201026165441.22894-1-nm@ti.com/__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!KWOx2aLl7hlHQrN--kiz1N5WaPWgeZzFZ12ptg8NzJE2BSnxxrWmsoqn5vjMvpfO1bSGYQ$
> looks available in next now.
> 
> Can we queue this patch[1] up for 5.11 window?
> 
> Depending on your preference, I can carry the defconfig patch[2] (to
> prevent merge dependencies, might be good to get an immutable tag) OR
> you can pick the defconfig patch up that cleans after removing the
> symbol.
> 

I can apply SOC kconfig patch [1] to my soc branch. That branch with
some additional patches am going to send up, so it should
work. Let me know.

Regards,
Santosh