Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:51:19 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     "Li, Philip" <philip.li@intel.com>
Cc:     lkp <lkp@intel.com>, Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>,
        kuznet <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
        yoshfuji <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
        liuhangbin <liuhangbin@gmail.com>, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
        netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kbuild-all@lists.01.org" <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC
 with prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO
Message-ID: <20201112165119.54bd07ee@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <5bc4f8ce9a6c40029043bc902a38af25@intel.com>
References: <175b3433a4c.aea7c06513321.4158329434310691736@shytyi.net>
        <202011110944.7zNVZmvB-lkp@intel.com>
        <20201112162423.6b4de8d1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
        <5bc4f8ce9a6c40029043bc902a38af25@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 00:32:55 +0000 Li, Philip wrote:
> > Subject: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Variable SLAAC: SLAAC with
> > prefixes of arbitrary length in PIO
> > 
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:34:24 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:  
> > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>  
> > 
> > Good people of kernel test robot, could you please rephrase this to say
> > that the tag is only appropriate if someone is sending a fix up/follow
> > up patch?  
> Thanks for the input, based on your suggestion how about
> 
> Kindly add below tag as appropriate if you send a fix up/follow up patch

I'm not sure myself how best to phrase it, I'm not a native speaker.
How about:

Kindly add below tag if you send a new patch solely addressing this issue

> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> Or any wording change suggestion to make it more clear/friendly?