Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751164AbWHVIB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:01:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751346AbWHVIB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:01:57 -0400 Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:54680 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751164AbWHVIB4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:01:56 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Tim Hockin Subject: Re: PCI MMCONFIG aperture size Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:55:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: matthew@wil.cx, greg@kroah.com, Linux Kernel mailing list , Andrew Morton References: <20060822024237.GO16573@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20060822024237.GO16573@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608220955.31620.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 738 Lines: 22 > This says to me that (as long as the MCFG table has an End Bus Number of > 31) a 32 MB decode area (32 MB aligned, too) is valid. > > Would something like the below patch be accepted? It makes my system > work... I already got a patch to remove the complete e820 validation code because it broke far more than it fixed. That should fix your problem too. > Also, why are we forcing 32 bit base addresses? ACPI defines it to be a > 64 bit base... Where do you think we do that? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/