Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751275AbWHVID1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:03:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750711AbWHVID0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:03:26 -0400 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:10649 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751275AbWHVIDZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:03:25 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] x86_64: Reload CS when startup_64 is used. Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:03:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Magnus Damm , fastboot@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060821095328.3132.40575.sendpatchset@cherry.local> <1156208306.21411.85.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608221003.12608.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 382 Lines: 12 > So if we never reload %cs and only use the shadow values why does > the value in %cs matter? We usually do at the first IRET. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/