Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] Exynos: Simple QoS for exynos-bus using
 interconnect
To:     Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>, inki.dae@samsung.com
Cc:     krzk@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        a.swigon@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com,
        sw0312.kim@samsung.com, b.zolnierkie@samsung.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <2e4f8aa1-7be0-f65c-da7c-277327626812@samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 12:00:32 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0)
        Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6687cdd3-6e5b-f3c1-f784-33cc7c0d589a@samsung.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 201P
References: <CGME20201112141041eucas1p1a29130955afd4ec1d5d94cf17183920c@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
        <20201112140931.31139-1-s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
        <b0a8e994-06d2-e04a-579c-40580b71f760@linaro.org>
        <9cb7e3a6-2a3f-8f46-2bf1-d6d8ea01613b@samsung.com>
        <6687cdd3-6e5b-f3c1-f784-33cc7c0d589a@samsung.com>
Precedence: bulk

Hi Sylwester,

On 13.11.2020 11:32, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> On 13.11.2020 10:07, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 11/13/20 5:48 PM, Georgi Djakov wrote:
>>> On 11/12/20 16:09, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> [...]
>>> Good work Sylwester! Thank you and all the reviewers! What would be the merge
>>> path for this patchset? Looks like there is no build dependency between patches.
>>> Should i take just patches 2,3 or also patch 1? Chanwoo?
>> Hi Georgi,
>>
>> If you take the patch 2,3, I'll apply patch 1,4 to devfreq.git.
>> Hi Sylwester,
>> First of all, thanks for your work to finish it for a long time.
>> I'm very happy about finishing this work. It is very necessary feature
>> for the QoS. Once again, thank for your work.
> I would also like to thank everyone for provided feedback!
>
> As far as building is concerned the patches could be applied in any
> order. I think we could also apply the drm/exynos patch in same
> merge window. There could be runtime (or git bisect) regression
> only in case when INTERCONNECT is enabled and only (or as first)
> the dts and drm/exynos patches are applied.
>
> Hmm, maybe it's better to hold on with the drm patch, INTERCONNECT
> is disabled in arch/arm/configs/{multi_v7_defconfig, exynos_defconfig}
> but it is enabled in arch/arm64/configs/defconfig.

I don't think we need to delay DRM patch. Exynos DRM mixer is not 
available on ARM64 SoCs, so this won't be an issue.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland