Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp1068907pxb; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 03:28:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/GJZYTy4HdyQksY/DmhC5R3IVqaHgwO6Z8bM4IACTYDPBB2M7rtvLRo3CsasqxK/rtok/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d20e:: with SMTP id w14mr1466503ejz.479.1605266889764; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 03:28:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605266889; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y1EKq3gqCgdSnC1+v7bfQAPnTmRHthBTmWZRPstSho5RuwsccpvyDYDJVLgn0gJ+9X MURxUz035ZPzhHYwGdkv27k98ySCvv8UPW9pFwP+80NTS3sUEzauB9G6XJuwM+JfBNcf T9hmO4jmpRxxF8GqYeEBpFXISrbLUoUC2hoz7wbvSkCJc+K6GPJ8Ub7auhU3c8+GkKSH TgP/1zB1q0jyOxJtN2zh6YAeTc9Y9mQN8eZOzzVaR36arfRYmSD7N/+1ASEHrxMoOcaF bJnAeGTLAB73/NKrym8CYOCd4TegFAum3NzAhGGZAD3mURNDkphrM0fUfNu82pafSQ+F sKKA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=dqrICPfvZVoBzQanWJSNOVxx1wXWtlVtxcrsh2VjXIc=; b=KLpMg6B7s+FujfySGE2BDKybKFTwqvVvbTtQN0xyY6evf7RiCSgQQbOaqVmSyD4sOd KE+WYCXz8fU7nyiaduPVQuEL65WKPc9GwrzUmhwvCVZwzIsz1J3561ceSu7pm2+b8p6i Xdx01CWQL2ckoTTB9bF9i5A7EyzPfAnmuh3uwy9LyJarPVV5NBuY3QWz+S/1OX3GRE/o b4zoX8Ldz0HXp0XBwNb4ajzp1GQklS7xjURhnaTASjwQCPs6Z7LG2WtPCfQmEmDpVbCF 1B5At/klp9ADagzXgitVk/j+Z/ptKBWh8DgzXFzALZqmPw0PzcqlwAgflBZE/1IPg56V ql4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bx4si6036077edb.505.2020.11.13.03.27.45; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 03:28:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726456AbgKMLYn (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 06:24:43 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:36446 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726478AbgKMLY2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 06:24:28 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5479E1042; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 03:24:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id ED82C3F6CF; Fri, 13 Nov 2020 03:24:23 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Qian Cai , bigeasy@linutronix.de, bristot@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org, ouwen210@hotmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, qais.yousef@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, swood@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, tj@kernel.org, vincent.donnefort@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Add missing completion for affine_move_task() waiters Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:24:14 +0000 Message-Id: <20201113112414.2569-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Qian reported that some fuzzer issuing sched_setaffinity() ends up stuck on a wait_for_completion(). The problematic pattern seems to be: affine_move_task() // task_running() case stop_one_cpu(); wait_for_completion(&pending->done); Combined with, on the stopper side: migration_cpu_stop() // Task moved between unlocks and scheduling the stopper task_rq(p) != rq && // task_running() case dest_cpu >= 0 => no complete_all() This can happen with both PREEMPT and !PREEMPT, although !PREEMPT should be more likely to see this given the targeted task has a much bigger window to block and be woken up elsewhere before the stopper runs. Make migration_cpu_stop() always look at pending affinity requests; signal their completion if the stopper hits a rq mismatch but the task is still within its allowed mask. When Migrate-Disable isn't involved, this matches the previous set_cpus_allowed_ptr() vs migration_cpu_stop() behaviour. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8b62fd1ad1b18def27f18e2ee2df3ff5b36d0762.camel@redhat.com Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()") Reported-by: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- kernel/sched/core.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 02076e6d3792..fad0a8e62aca 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1923,7 +1923,7 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data) else p->wake_cpu = dest_cpu; - } else if (dest_cpu < 0) { + } else if (dest_cpu < 0 || pending) { /* * This happens when we get migrated between migrate_enable()'s * preempt_enable() and scheduling the stopper task. At that @@ -1933,6 +1933,17 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data) * more likely. */ + /* + * The task moved before the stopper got to run. We're holding + * ->pi_lock, so the allowed mask is stable - if it got + * somewhere allowed, we're done. + */ + if (pending && cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), p->cpus_ptr)) { + p->migration_pending = NULL; + complete = true; + goto out; + } + /* * When this was migrate_enable() but we no longer have an * @pending, a concurrent SCA 'fixed' things and we should be -- 2.27.0