Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
References: <e4e6cc45-bc18-40ec-035e-fdb45b9a8f46@gmail.com>
 <87o8lf74j5.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <CAPDyKFosR2wd=jqADBF_dNd3kCMbM4oDAHyxiYC-5RF=SZ_E5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1jzh3p9rs6.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
 <CAPDyKFq8dM7Z48uUWHai83avwdhOOGU2NEefM7ifaOUcfW+BsA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 27.1
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Brad Harper <bjharper@gmail.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        "open list:ARM/Amlogic Meson..." <linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: meson-gx: remove IRQF_ONESHOT
In-reply-to: <CAPDyKFq8dM7Z48uUWHai83avwdhOOGU2NEefM7ifaOUcfW+BsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1jft5d1doq.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:25:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk


On Wed 11 Nov 2020 at 11:47, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 at 16:05, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu 08 Oct 2020 at 11:08, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thomas, thanks a lot for helping out and looking at this!
>> >
>> > It looks like the testing of the patch below went well. Are you
>> > intending to queue up the patch via your tip tree?
>> >
>> > If you need any help, just tell us!
>> >
>> > Kind regards
>> > Uffe
>> >
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Do we have a plan for this issue ?
>> I've had Thomas's change in my tree for a month, so far, so good.
>
> Instead of waiting for Thomas, perhaps you can pick up his patch and
> re-submit it?

TBH, I'm not confortable signing off something when I have no idea about
the implication, which is the case here.

>
> From my side, I can of course apply your original fix to the mmc
> driver, as an intermediate step.

In Thomas first reply, I did not really understand if it was bad from
the driver to use IRQF_ONESHOT. If it is OK, i'd prefer if things stayed
as they are. Otherwise, feel free to apply it.

> Is there a hurry?
>

Absolutely no hurry, at least not for me.

I noticed I still had Thomas's patch on top of the last rc which means
it had not been applied yet. Fishing for news, that's all.

> Kind regards
> Uffe