Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751294AbWHVM4G (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:56:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751387AbWHVM4G (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:56:06 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:36067 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbWHVM4F (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:56:05 -0400 Message-ID: <44EAFEE3.8080700@goop.org> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:56:03 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060613) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geert Uytterhoeven CC: Adrian Bunk , Rusty Russell , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , virtualization , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Chris Wright Subject: Re: [PATCH] paravirt.h References: <1155202505.18420.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44DB7596.6010503@goop.org> <20060819012133.GH7813@stusta.de> <44E67B6E.10706@goop.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 698 Lines: 19 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> relicensing them. >> > > That's a pretty strong statement... > Well, I'm not making any kind of legal statement. I'm just pointing out that from a technical perspective, there's a large visible functional change from before if we use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(paravirt_ops) vs EXPORT_SYMBOL(paravirt_ops). Given that the whole point of paravirt_ops is to minimize visible changes, this seems counterproductive. J - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/