Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932311AbWHVPNu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:13:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932312AbWHVPNu (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:13:50 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:60919 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932311AbWHVPNs convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:13:48 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Jeff Dike Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce kernel_execve function to replace __KERNEL_SYSCALLS__ Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:13:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Bj?rn Steinbrink , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Russell King , Andrew Morton , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <20060819073031.GA25711@atjola.homenet> <200608221207.00344.arnd@arndb.de> <20060822133945.GA3813@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20060822133945.GA3813@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608221713.40165.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:c48f057754fc1b1a557605ab9fa6da41 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1531 Lines: 30 On Tuesday 22 August 2006 15:39, Jeff Dike wrote: > You're contemplating changing UML to do, e.g. > ????????syscall(NR_write, fd, buf, len) > instead of the current > ????????write(fd, buf,len) > ? > > That hardly seems like an improvement and it seems fairly unnecessary. > No, that's not what I was referring to. I was thinking of the calls: arch/um/os-Linux/process.c:inline _syscall0(pid_t, getpid) arch/um/os-Linux/sys-i386/tls.c:static _syscall1(int, get_thread_area, user_desc_t *, u_info); arch/um/os-Linux/tls.c:static _syscall1(int, get_thread_area, user_desc_t *, u_info); arch/um/os-Linux/tls.c:static _syscall1(int, set_thread_area, user_desc_t *, u_info); arch/um/sys-i386/unmap.c:static inline _syscall2(int,munmap,void *,start,size_t,len) arch/um/sys-i386/unmap.c:static inline _syscall6(void *,mmap2,void *,addr,size_t,len,int,prot,int,flags,int,fd,off_t,offset) arch/um/sys-x86_64/unmap.c:static inline _syscall2(int,munmap,void *,start,size_t,len) arch/um/sys-x86_64/unmap.c:static inline _syscall6(void *,mmap,void *,addr,size_t,len,int,prot,int,flags,int,fd,off_t,offset) Are these for calling the host OS or calling the UML kernel? If they are for the host, they can be implemented using syscall(), otherwise by calling the sys_* functions directly. Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/