Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp2067381pxb; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 12:00:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxozESj0OLTpsJ+6N3gi6uSeHpEZFH7EfTlE+T6G2Pe96QdcCLuzHOWk3CAPsOJo9/m71yo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:17d1:: with SMTP id u17mr7813511eje.6.1605384043517; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 12:00:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605384043; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lGOjkWXPgbrGVaA+BbUG0ss6Wfsj2W7O8IWN8/FtlmBFYdym60btVOlCbXLAgQS4/W /dE2kkRLczc05OS9pdTPEJNtrGrLTe2/n1WSYmvmCrKvhEsKK3F2Pkb7dCDK6yupDbfG i5OxAfq8cUbfAfee8O5SntnQZo1o/ORD2mC4wQsxxJlV2rnC1LLauSprGhqVff1UCY2e 3cT48tfhuYIBVz+ioWB7DSsgHluEqej+I+H3Uc/SWS/yeu6X/Kqu1p7uYfrvPjCIlaWX 1BahRcbtcIIx9AsT3u/FztN7/T774SAt5xu9VcoHeogwkoXD4jzvYLsu75AbAT25eF4k 9Hsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=eczyD1wLJv4ITUeTfR364X8trwMQQ9Fv8tUeDA2QIKc=; b=MjrrWFOqRK+/E6sPPKdguKCVuHnCA0W+6QEr6o/RE6mD9A/DfUa3PedRBkC9fS6kRa C/S2O2ujDjS1er/ND1J5FuVozTWhpSfMEAUUlcBp5uCNoVjIU3/kavRDOSS09r0spWG9 jscWguPyrCoa3yl5Q3Tr5TvjeXGjly4zcDdeV18r81AUHHtB/lbpILLm4EyzY7XbVUR2 CjpuOMwvZh3hwjsyjLmeYL0GI2JR5YVdiT6oBxeA39J2bXS3V1e8jVH3KWkPgfAkS7jh e6FFs5Oxvg5YAo6cki+JmSZvaGGViethg0mMMJ3bqnJlvMe898Xz3sMFeUuDpPe4ZKHU 76Ng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i22si8551442ejr.184.2020.11.14.12.00.20; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 12:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726275AbgKNT6s (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:58:48 -0500 Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]:58318 "EHLO asavdk4.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726174AbgKNT6s (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:58:48 -0500 Received: from ravnborg.org (unknown [188.228.123.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asavdk4.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DE2F8054C; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 20:58:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 20:58:43 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Caleb Connolly Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Thierry Reding , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/panel/samsung-sofef00: Add panel for OnePlus 6/T devices Message-ID: <20201114195843.GA3900471@ravnborg.org> References: <20201112161920.2671430-1-caleb@connolly.tech> <20201112161920.2671430-2-caleb@connolly.tech> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201112161920.2671430-2-caleb@connolly.tech> X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=VafZwmh9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=S6zTFyMACwkrwXSdXUNehg==:117 a=S6zTFyMACwkrwXSdXUNehg==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OPaO7OcAVtVQApmh9Q0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Caleb, On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:21:13PM +0000, Caleb Connolly wrote: > The OnePlus 6/T devices use different panels however they are > functionally identical with the only differences being the resolution. > The panels also don't seem to be used by any other devices, just combine > them into one driver. > > The panels are: samsung,sofef00 > and samsung,s6e3fc2x01 > > Signed-off-by: Caleb Connolly Thanks, applied to drm-misc-next. Fixed a few checkpatch --strict warnings when applying. Please check with --strict in the future. Sam