Subject: Re: [take12 0/3] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism.
From: Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608221059030.26026@d.namei>
References: <1156230051.8055.27.camel@entropy>
	 <20060822072448.GA5126@2ka.mipt.ru> <1156234672.8055.51.camel@entropy>
	 <20060822.012341.57449506.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <1156237191.8055.59.camel@entropy>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0608221059030.26026@d.namei>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:00:23 -0700
Message-Id: <1156276823.2476.22.camel@entropy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 979
Lines: 25

On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 10:59 -0400, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Nicholas Miell wrote:
> 
> > In this brave new world of always stable kernel development, the time a
> > new interface has for public testing before a new kernel release is
> > drastically shorter than the old unstable development series, and if
> > nobody is documenting how this stuff is supposed to work and
> > demonstrating how it will be used, then mistakes are bound to slip
> > through.
> 
> Feel free to provide the documentation.  Perhaps, even as much as you've 
> written so far in these emails would be enough.
> 

I'm not the one proposing the new (potentially wrong) interface. The
onus isn't on me.

-- 
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/