Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 06:17:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 06:17:45 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:30469 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 2 Nov 2001 06:17:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 09:17:16 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: safemode Cc: Mark Hahn , Subject: Re: graphical swap comparison of aa and rik vm In-Reply-To: <20011102041819.4C36238C0A@perninha.conectiva.com.br> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, safemode wrote: > I think the answer of why AA's kernel beat rik's has nothing to do > with how much swap rik is using or how much swap is being swapped back > in. It has to do with how rik decides what to swap. Apparently the > algorithm used by rik to play with memory is taking seriously too much > cpu and it leaves little for the actual process to work. Note that this is likely to be a side effect of running completely out of swap, because that means many of the "obvious candidates" of what to swap out cannot be swapped out, meaning we have to scan more pages until we find something which already has swap backing. Before you draw conclusions like the one above, please test again with more swap. regards, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/