Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751423AbWHWGwt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:52:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751426AbWHWGwt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:52:49 -0400 Received: from 8.ctyme.com ([69.50.231.8]:34227 "EHLO darwin.ctyme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbWHWGws (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:52:48 -0400 Message-ID: <44EBFB3E.8070905@perkel.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:52:46 -0700 From: Marc Perkel User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Hardware vs. Software Raid Speed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamfilter-host: darwin.ctyme.com - http://www.junkemailfilter.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 431 Lines: 9 Running Linux on an AMD AM2 nVidia chip ser that supports Raid 0 striping on the motherboard. Just wondering if hardware raid (SATA2) is going to be faster that software raid and why? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/