Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965086AbWHWR66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:58:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932448AbWHWR66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:58:58 -0400 Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([62.242.22.158]:51554 "EHLO kernel.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932324AbWHWR66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:58:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:01:18 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Andrew Morton Cc: Akinobu Mita , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, okuji@enbug.org Subject: Re: [patch 4/5] fail-injection capability for disk IO Message-ID: <20060823180118.GY5893@suse.de> References: <20060823113243.210352005@localhost.localdomain> <20060823113317.722640313@localhost.localdomain> <20060823120355.GD5893@suse.de> <20060823102741.b927e092.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060823102741.b927e092.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1814 Lines: 61 On Wed, Aug 23 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:03:55 +0200 > Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 23 2006, Akinobu Mita wrote: > > > This patch provides fail-injection capability for disk IO. > > > > > > Boot option: > > > > > > fail_make_request=,,, > > > > > > > > > > > > specifies how often it should fail in percent. > > > > > > > > > > > > specifies the interval of failures. > > > > > > > > > > > > specifies how many times failures may happen at most. > > > > > > > > > > > > specifies the size of free space where disk IO can be issued > > > safely in bytes. > > > > > > Example: > > > > > > fail_make_request=100,10,-1,0 > > > > > > generic_make_request() fails once per 10 times. > > > > Hmm dunno, seems a pretty useless feature to me. > > We need it. What is the FS/VFS/VM behaviour in the presence of IO > errors? Nobody knows, because we rarely test it. Those few times where > people _do_ test it (the hard way), bad things tend to happen. reiserfs > (for example) likes to go wobble, wobble, wobble, BUG. You misunderstood me - a global parameter is useless, as it makes it pretty impossible for people to use this for any sort of testing (unless it's very specialized). I didn't say a feature to test io errors was useless! > > Wouldn't it make a lot > > more sense to do this per-queue instead of a global entity? > > Yes, I think so. /sys/block/sda/sda2/make-it-fail. Precisely. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/