Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp4205619pxb; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:22:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzq1o75pheClLKI/GMtCjAgrNcqxO0Wi/fdSxnG0KfUe+jxx4+QQ8VZdXKRi7PdQXkRnUFd X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c889:: with SMTP id p9mr22573695eds.110.1605651727170; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:22:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605651727; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RAO5pxgnWaFiVQtMyqsyKycs/q/T4blKRCvmQmetuTz99LyetMH6D6HoL9HirYgQXq l0XPp8yqv0UlPqqvyjpJNxUNH9o7rtrR67326/3A0RdfPllD+/c5rl9YP35+9rsA1XUR CuSZY7IX90ISOApLNz7q3nd6t7i2kkULpoMD74+ofxCawU5C7jaItPMhyvvFtpHrINt8 e0RLnOw6Db0L7L3maRYtqL1X1RwfZTSH/HwITA83kpEi6AZYu4deoLxwkSFq34sw8eQS jA31Y7U8u9mZGajmJogGrWp2zDJIQkHrsv9FwdTjvgOTBctDAGsUUSUyfZF8KQ9by43k H3tw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=3IZevOA1TYaqlpz4jXud4XTUKkEojCa5/tAJ+9D8lXY=; b=w25jj6pnLG/iu3crkql0BcmTlMbU596VHzA0EO/5Gn4ujykfReh9DUoSfS5s7eZNSI 5IiIz+EZeMXj4RfiqHK9kyQirT8c1w5SutZZjQp4A2jY5OSsokX4PAC5DztoUkTnJZm6 C9LinYRRjOlklv6m+lrMNoq4600o9fix8zKoN1+YNJYn1xh3hZ6RjBqsfEcMWi6LaUJw 4ICNer5dCDaeifgsvSAaNXNCAebVp6a2fQw19O9EW7uwLheMHTug0p/wbM3PA6b4HVuK TIHhUSDGqEdZ94Vf/+XRDqxpZKPiHTrKg7fpXcGZgBWYGE19EGaL1xet7aAMs+pO75Td e6pA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r16si11345365ejb.207.2020.11.17.14.21.43; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:22:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728397AbgKQWTI (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:19:08 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36328 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726182AbgKQWTI (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:19:08 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4D6120678; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:19:04 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Kees Cook Cc: LKML , Mathieu Desnoyers , Matt Mullins , Ingo Molnar , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Dmitry Vyukov , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , netdev , bpf Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to memory allocation Message-ID: <20201117171904.2d455699@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <202011171330.94C6BA7E93@keescook> References: <20201116175107.02db396d@gandalf.local.home> <202011171330.94C6BA7E93@keescook> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 13:33:42 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > As I think got discussed in the thread, what you had here wouldn't work > in a CFI build if the function prototype of the call site and the > function don't match. (Though I can't tell if .func() is ever called?) > > i.e. .func's prototype must match tp_stub_func()'s. > Hmm, I wonder how you handle tracepoints? This is called here: include/linux/tracepoint.h: #define DEFINE_TRACE_FN(_name, _reg, _unreg, proto, args) \ static const char __tpstrtab_##_name[] \ __section("__tracepoints_strings") = #_name; \ extern struct static_call_key STATIC_CALL_KEY(tp_func_##_name); \ int __traceiter_##_name(void *__data, proto); \ struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##_name __used \ __section("__tracepoints") = { \ .name = __tpstrtab_##_name, \ .key = STATIC_KEY_INIT_FALSE, \ .static_call_key = &STATIC_CALL_KEY(tp_func_##_name), \ .static_call_tramp = STATIC_CALL_TRAMP_ADDR(tp_func_##_name), \ .iterator = &__traceiter_##_name, \ .regfunc = _reg, \ .unregfunc = _unreg, \ .funcs = NULL }; \ __TRACEPOINT_ENTRY(_name); \ int __traceiter_##_name(void *__data, proto) \ { \ struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \ void *it_func; \ \ it_func_ptr = \ rcu_dereference_raw((&__tracepoint_##_name)->funcs); \ do { \ it_func = (it_func_ptr)->func; \ __data = (it_func_ptr)->data; \ ((void(*)(void *, proto))(it_func))(__data, args); \ ^^^^ called above ^^^^ Where args is unique for every tracepoint, but func is simply a void pointer. -- Steve } while ((++it_func_ptr)->func); \ return 0; \ } \