Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: Ping(3): [PATCH v4] <sys/param.h>: Add nitems()
To:     Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc:     libc-alpha@sourceware.org, libc-coord@lists.openwall.com,
        fweimer@redhat.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, ville.voutilainen@gmail.com,
        linux-man@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org,
        jwakely@redhat.com, enh@google.com
References: <20200928191237.32063-1-colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
 <e23782c8-2bee-a4dd-1bcc-d67cfd9f47d3@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011172242582.28480@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
From:   Alejandro Colomar <colomar.6.4.3@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8fb9c722-4190-6115-1d60-d94f8db7f749@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:59:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011172242582.28480@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi Joseph,

On 11/17/20 11:44 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> I've asked the WG14 reflector why N2529 (and N2530, though that one's not
> relevant to this feature) doesn't seem to have made it onto a meeting
> agenda yet, when there have been two WG14 meetings since that proposal
was
> made and a third one coming up.
>

Nice!
Please update me on any feedback you receive.

So glibc will basically hold this patch
at least until the WG answers to that, right?

Thanks,

Alex