Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp269994pxb; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:12:41 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvC3P42NvIKm3mnD+l4+eYVM26uj+yP8E9reuXG8ksvnqYrDQAg/YntL0HDMTWDXCiKP7N X-Received: by 2002:a50:d742:: with SMTP id i2mr299012edj.154.1605701558900; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:12:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605701558; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=O/qzRkYs6BvnkZNSh1wisgd2edbbM1yX61wljH8WMrT4FyhBv4p8NkdnWHG7AigaVO 1Nar1ECLvj/brJDuC+3i4UgZD2bjM8E+Etaz+zMZeRncej3IwdYlp4wzKCBK8pa0tADc XsB6TR85mGVyOUNdB2N/QzxJzO8+nZ3dyv8yZCrqZLU5f7xBswq8YQ1lewltX9uvophr 6t9Dsg7LDReHJgR9k4kJezeDp18oQi+phQkmLBjTgPyvFxBZB7bu6zMpkXgU/mj3U6WN CUajkboTHZxZ17jlR+lcvIiNJDkb2EsKp1zPHBdjFbpCn/pU6H0uZkZsUmQVPPaZedGy q3pg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:in-reply-to:subject :cc:to:from:user-agent:references; bh=QeRIJqGCyyUGOIpziXNDeJQrkPlt9NRMW/Iy8hpg0go=; b=SnT6kBZ4mNRRvYw9AC+jfHSsSFsjfubkaRcOLofvkfjgFMAzWNlJL5muucU7D47oTo i0jUtIpyf2EmSgi/bvYGJX2wGep+nbZFflSZjDgU2CadyIj9Ldi727T59dt3hvyiZGiX pXS80+8JKTOBE8rkHva+s0lYQdEgudEKJx55EI/kCUhr99LeJyhvdvwIlUSRAmf7mjSZ qHyEd++SvQ8QFwfDUJbLQtRyXHVKeU2BudMAInHhT0NsRFYChhsE3BoWuJFs2SHE3bSf 1AwLXssztUTxfi6B9V5k5C7zG/dtNSnTX0UIqyyzBURi2gfPwAPbvI7+82erCaZ03B0d 7U6Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s4si15536745edy.473.2020.11.18.04.12.15; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:12:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726731AbgKRMK5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:10:57 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:53228 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726385AbgKRMK5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:10:57 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB1111D4; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:10:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2809A3F70D; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 04:10:54 -0800 (PST) References: <20201113112414.2569-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20201115115849.GA6943@geo.homenetwork> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 26.3 From: Valentin Schneider To: Tao Zhou Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qian Cai , bigeasy@linutronix.de, bristot@redhat.com, bsegall@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@kernel.org, ouwen210@hotmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, qais.yousef@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, swood@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, tj@kernel.org, vincent.donnefort@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Add missing completion for affine_move_task() waiters In-reply-to: <20201115115849.GA6943@geo.homenetwork> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:10:51 +0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15/11/20 11:59, Tao Zhou wrote: > Oh, I did not receive this patch from 'ouwen210@hotmail.com' > account. Checked that you sent the patch to that mail address > from web. If 'ouwen210' is not a good mail account name(I have > used this name since 2002), I will change to use this one(Now > is smooth enough and can go to lkml). > Nah, any address is fine. I grabbed whatever emails were cc'd to the patch this is fixing - just make sure you're using the right address (i.e. the one you want LKML stuff to go to) when interacting on the list and you should be good. > Thanks, > Tao