Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030356AbWHXGpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:45:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030354AbWHXGpR (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:45:17 -0400 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:24243 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030353AbWHXGpP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 02:45:15 -0400 To: Edward Falk Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix x86_64 _spin_lock_irqsave() References: <44ED157D.6050607@google.com> From: Andi Kleen Date: 24 Aug 2006 08:45:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <44ED157D.6050607@google.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 563 Lines: 10 Edward Falk writes: > Add spin_lock_string_flags and _raw_spin_lock_flags() to > asm-x86_64/spinlock.h so that _spin_lock_irqsave() has the same > semantics on x86_64 as it does on i386 and does *not* have interrupts > disabled while it is waiting for the lock. Did it fix anything for you? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/