Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201112115115.GA11069@ubuntu> <945f377d-1975-552d-25b2-1dc25d3c3a46@st.com>
 <2d25d1aa-bd8a-f0db-7888-9f72edc9f687@st.com> <20201116151028.GA1519@ubuntu>
 <e5e49e1a-dc2a-ce16-425c-d2d87f415868@st.com> <20201116224003.GC3892875@xps15>
 <50549519-d9ff-9048-a3d8-dab02bfda096@st.com> <20201117160330.GA15538@ubuntu>
 <a653c503-7fd1-7b87-88a5-88c9002ba410@st.com> <20201118000647.GA4113759@xps15>
 <20201118070836.GA19190@ubuntu>
In-Reply-To: <20201118070836.GA19190@ubuntu>
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:16:16 -0700
Message-ID: <CANLsYkzeEp5h_3ObJCHaa_g8snRQ17_BFNA3Am-zjM7PExgu=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] rpmsg: Turn name service into a stand alone driver
To:     Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com>
Cc:     Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>,
        "ohad@wizery.com" <ohad@wizery.com>,
        "bjorn.andersson@linaro.org" <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        "linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 00:08, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 05:06:47PM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I confirm that all this is working as expected - I will send a new revision of
> > this set tomorrow afternoon.
> >
> > Guennadi, can I add a Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by with your name on the
> > patch?
>
> You can add the "Co-developed-by" tag, sure, if you like. As for the SOB: I'm
> not sure if this is a proper use of it? AFAIK SOB is used when that person
> "transmitted" the patch, e.g. if they developed and submitted it to a list,
> or if they received it from someone and forwarded it upstream (maintainer
> case). I'm not sure about this case, but well, feel free, don't think we'd
> be violating anything since I did send versions of code, similar to parts of
> that, some with my SOF, so, should be fine.
>

If a Co-developed-by is present, a SOB _has_ to be present as well.

> Thanks
> Guennadi