Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] Rename lock_cpu_hotplug/unlock_cpu_hotplug
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: ego@in.ibm.com
Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@intel.linux.com, mingo@elte.hu,
       davej@redhat.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, vatsa@in.ibm.com,
       ashok.raj@intel.com
In-Reply-To: <20060824103417.GE2395@in.ibm.com>
References: <20060824103417.GE2395@in.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: Intel International BV
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:00:00 +0200
Message-Id: <1156417200.3014.54.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 882
Lines: 24

On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 16:04 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> 
> 
> This patch renames lock_cpu_hotplug to cpu_hotplug_disable and
> unlock_cpu_hotplug to cpu_hotplug_enable throughout the kernel.

Hi,

to be honest I dislike the new names too. You turned it into a refcount,
which is good, but the normal linux name for such refcount functions is
_get and _put.....  and in addition the refcount technically isn't
hotplug specific, all you want is to keep the kernel data for the
processor as being "used", so cpu_get() and cpu_put() would sound
reasonable names to me, or cpu_data_get() cpu_data_put().


Greetings,
   Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/