Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp343235pxb; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:42:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdoZYOKJwRB58TSanXzEmP68zWF3cDLfZzoHJ67lu0ayysGKGqt1aflK+MI3Ul04dZRq8R X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17ac:: with SMTP id j12mr29628460edy.31.1605782528979; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:42:08 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1605782528; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D8O/W+FmoywhJmpV1TuxWaM0PSh/XWypa5ukzzC95RqIR2cemxS1VCsaS0GT7PR9Bs G0yCfAeMtXMHvPqC0M4n2b7lqBSgp1fsGmOGp00t5D1ZWeziD4fiI3CAqKJc9TuW1Xo3 Hs0dKjWKd7Prnrztf2VpvLIvHWhnDfJIvjEWEkyzoezwreX3Q/geB/t7+KaG4f/q34Y3 iDh3DaQNm2F/uxVDi6765r7kjWWTQGlrfHq0duN4ObmbuYSxuDzDL3INXJxhMfkNiavD evisC1/yw0QyG1d9M9Pmkrl/xVCVEGq1+YgXVQjhKR8YZzPgRZ2yndey3ktk1UYdlY1w MkSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=wq6ZPMhFLbdXc8QyYNVBmJBopXnJqJMS8qeTWv8Ho2U=; b=DbchFYv3XOOYj7Mhu2IQ3nxut/9bZsUWVrTLJ2ujwKXqApQApiOcKmLFWteE1PiJFG aP1lRqIo282yzZq7xp5RVqtmqIzyUBaABS1ja30EGS8tf2Ckd8FekQeAWSOL7Fy6xTWl FTvQoLzNpD1+CkQTiztNbNHcJ4FgyxChgucjBphx/Xmol1MCdgSP3FVpksE/vvgiajPu GcWV2G/Nho3RVtpHf3wJ1WasaxEeW9YXh457UWlIOS+6fHTIZVgGzRNWkrQGfIZUmzPg aQJBE96/zRNR8el6gtOHbefRYAtWEbAN1/+no3luWoqs1IeEOT/7p9j5+8iE8nDn7W+t T6wg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dn24si2023272edb.11.2020.11.19.02.41.45; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726644AbgKSKiQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 05:38:16 -0500 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:7936 "EHLO szxga07-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726515AbgKSKiP (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 05:38:15 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4CcGNN4TCpz6wHs; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:37:56 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.113.133) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:38:10 +0800 From: Wang Hai To: , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH net] ipvs: fix possible memory leak in ip_vs_control_net_init Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:41:02 +0800 Message-ID: <20201119104102.67427-1-wanghai38@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.133] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kmemleak report a memory leak as follows: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff8880759ea000 (size 256): comm "syz-executor.3", pid 6484, jiffies 4297476946 (age 48.546s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 08 a0 9e 75 80 88 ff ff ...........u.... 08 a0 9e 75 80 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 ad 4e ad de ...u.........N.. backtrace: [<00000000c0bf2deb>] kmem_cache_zalloc include/linux/slab.h:656 [inline] [<00000000c0bf2deb>] __proc_create+0x23d/0x7d0 fs/proc/generic.c:421 [<000000009d718d02>] proc_create_reg+0x8e/0x140 fs/proc/generic.c:535 [<0000000097bbfc4f>] proc_create_net_data+0x8c/0x1b0 fs/proc/proc_net.c:126 [<00000000652480fc>] ip_vs_control_net_init+0x308/0x13a0 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:4169 [<000000004c927ebe>] __ip_vs_init+0x211/0x400 net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c:2429 [<00000000aa6b72d9>] ops_init+0xa8/0x3c0 net/core/net_namespace.c:151 [<00000000153fd114>] setup_net+0x2de/0x7e0 net/core/net_namespace.c:341 [<00000000be4e4f07>] copy_net_ns+0x27d/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:482 [<00000000f1c23ec9>] create_new_namespaces+0x382/0xa30 kernel/nsproxy.c:110 [<00000000098a5757>] copy_namespaces+0x2e6/0x3b0 kernel/nsproxy.c:179 [<0000000026ce39e9>] copy_process+0x220a/0x5f00 kernel/fork.c:2072 [<00000000b71f4efe>] _do_fork+0xc7/0xda0 kernel/fork.c:2428 [<000000002974ee96>] __do_sys_clone3+0x18a/0x280 kernel/fork.c:2703 [<0000000062ac0a4d>] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46 [<0000000093f1ce2c>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 In the error path of ip_vs_control_net_init(), remove_proc_entry() needs to be called to remove the added proc entry, otherwise a memory leak will occur. Fixes: b17fc9963f83 ("IPVS: netns, ip_vs_stats and its procfs") Fixes: 61b1ab4583e2 ("IPVS: netns, add basic init per netns.") Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Wang Hai --- net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c index e279ded4e306..d99bb89e7c25 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c @@ -4180,6 +4180,9 @@ int __net_init ip_vs_control_net_init(struct netns_ipvs *ipvs) return 0; err: + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats_percpu", ipvs->net->proc_net); + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs_stats", ipvs->net->proc_net); + remove_proc_entry("ip_vs", ipvs->net->proc_net); free_percpu(ipvs->tot_stats.cpustats); return -ENOMEM; } -- 2.17.1